1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. 3. F inal judgment having been entered, Defendant filed a Bill of Costs on April 10, 2006, seeking the taxation of $5,292.75. awarded as follows. 1. 2. Service Fees - The $146.00 claimed is allowed. Court Reporter F ees - Pursuant to Local Rule LRCiv 54.1 (e)(3), of the $3,753.90 claimed, only $3,173.90 is allowed. (N o P er Diem, ETranscript, M in-U-Script or Word Index allowed.) Exemplification Fees - Pursuant to Local Rule LRCiv 54.1 (e)(5), the $415.35 claimed is denied. Interpreter Costs - The $977.50 claimed is allowed. The matter has been reviewed and costs have been vs. EA G LE P RO D U C E PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., ABEL RUIZ DIAZ, ET AL., Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) L I M I T E D) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV 03-2127 PHX M HM TAXATION OF COS TS ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
It is therefore ordered that $4,297.40 be taxed by the Clerk and made a part of the judgment.
Case 2:03-cv-02127-MHM
Document 110
Filed 05/24/2006
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED this 24th day of M ay, 2006.
RICHARD H. WEARE, CLERK
By:
Case 2:03-cv-02127-MHM
Document 110
-2Filed 05/24/2006
Page 2 of 2