Free Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

n
nw UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB D
2 8 2006
, CATH _
0.SYé08é¥'5Pi%'!0·°1§““
JOHN CARBOUN, husband; et al., No. 05-17134
Plaintiffs — Appellants, D.C. No. CV-03-02146-DGC
District of Arizona, Phoenix
v.
J _ CHANDLER,abody politic; et" " 3 3 2 3 ‘ or e ·e ~ ~ — A~————-{AA \ ..
al., I ORDER
Defendants — Appellees.
Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner A
Appe1lees’ motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction is denied
without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the answering brief. See Nat ’l
Indus. v. Republic Ncit’l Lfe Ins. C0., 677 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1982) (stating
that merits panel can consider appellate jurisdiction despite earlier denial of
so r motion to dismiss); see1zls0eSc0&t—vTMaekinists¤wfa¢:e.—Ylr¢z~eles East. Ledgeé/0.494 A AA A
0fN Cal., 827 F.2d 589, 592 (9th Cir. 1987). A ‘ Vg `
V
Case 2:O3—cv-02146-DGC Document 233 Filed IO3/06/2006 Page 1 of 2

K; 05-1 71 34
The Clerk shall file the opening brief receiyed February 13, 2006. The
answering brief is due March 15, 2006, and the optional reply brief is due within
{4 days after service of the answering brief. h
5
t e;
S :\MOATT\Cmshords\O2 .O6\l1\05- 1 1 34 .wpd 2
Case 2:O3—cv—O2146—DGC Document 233 Filed O3/06/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02146-DGC

Document 233

Filed 03/06/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02146-DGC

Document 233

Filed 03/06/2006

Page 2 of 2