Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 91.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 24, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 972 Words, 5,781 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35191/118.pdf

Download Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona ( 91.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona
E `.,.. ___ Fausu _LODGED
léewrl m. 1?¤—$¤=l nzlaqq nscmvam __a cczpv
f[n;;lrw. State}; Pnsorr - E-Kmem j
U r 3 -
M;:J;e; l FEB 2 3 ZM
Fl AL $5231 { (3 EH —
l?l;m);vU‘l¤?:?{g¢_ H]; §g, _V Ll3|§TLFl|?21p§gm_§gp?;JHT
IM THE UMITED smfzs Dlsmner mower
E0}?. Tl-lE' Dl$T'E:c:`l' OF HEJZOMA
l(E=./ln! 1*/l.7<-’0‘/, M0. CV 03~2!50- PH!-Sr?5 (MEA)
PlcL£nl:lFlf
yl MOTION TO REMOVE
WHMDH E. HOFMANN
STATE' OF HEIZOMH, ei-. 6;/., AS DEFENSE COU!J5El.
D€l`endanfS.
Plaeanti-QQ Kevm M. l?¤<3, ggc gg, herebng moves ·d>n·s court tp remove
bdanola E. Haqfmamv as Dehnse Ce¤.mSel Har the lbllawrhj reasons:
HAI; Ll; qc 114; Fln‘Z,R’_Suprem< Ch-, gpfafabable, ri? UUS C¤u.r·£. bmj,
wang Lgcq ful; Q3_z(r1Q pmwkfes 1}: Ed=n2;a/ Kale 3.7(:¤):
Fl lawjer Shall nal: acl: as advocate at a trral lh whlfelo
Ur}:. l¢3<.·J* lv :
wg)Uz;g ·l;es1b‘m¤n% relates to an ¢me.¤m';es=l:ed fssue;
[Z) Une testrmcmg, relates to the nature and va/ere 016
le al Serwe·,cS Fcflalercd M du case; gr
(2) drs uallfrtchan ayc five lawjgw would world subséarrlqrel
lnardshig On ‘D’4e Glremh.
Ulagn avsewaag the ewderzce rr: mls casa, Plam¥=#‘»@" al·‘s¢~¤·-Mxeal Uaat
wanda E Hclmmn will be Called as 0. wH:r2esS. Hofmann was fn cmfacff
with Delendanf Lmderrrlarz in regards {en the relr%»‘z>us p¤l·‘c·3,_, reviewed liz,
and advrsed lam as tg is ·{e¢ba!F:E·z as yl was applsed to Flaiaf/W, fn
pad, l'l0pM0r'l/l mar-J rlaéhflmg have been ae deacendmff ffl ‘d'lf&$' MS2.
7?€%C»\.{`Cll}Y% EUIOIEGI will 3·,7((.Ll in {SSUFS
that Pwlam contested (elle, H-olmarws role rr; advlsmagr or Freilmcé kn adwael
Case 2:O3—cv—O2150-SRB—I\/IEA D0cur4ént118 Filed O2/23/2006 Page10f3

Dehondcnis 0F the [i!>Ie<3oJd¤Z», o? their cioéwns Md P¤¤!·?=¢`¢—¤), and her
dasjqolihzobcn as 4;;oomg,o{ wail not work sUbsf:oni-z`o.{ hordshqo on DeFend¤w¤..
Ho{marm rs ooh? ooo of hundreds mh odomoggo rh im oféu of who M-oorooz
C;..m¢m\, Thgrca IS, no 0!Js·!:mc£iv€ Mfu; m Hofmomn {Spr which owoihcr
attcrnezy in her chqho cooud not e6r¤»'I¤=’S
Cre¢1·(;1?7D] CL Gc>rryO{;E;‘£; vp JFIIELKES25
Cbmbmn? doe roles of advocate and wines: com prcjoobao P/omffmqg
Qryd can my0{;;; cl G0f'Jpf(.<1`&. O16 {/MEC/€3£ bzfwzen Heh GAC}! D{‘|C€i‘7dd!77E•S»
Pfmnhm has proper 0!>\gec£:‘ore whore The C.omb:$aoé2£»»;· of no/es
010*2 gre_gud.2,; his mzhhs M Uh; !i!::¢3¢¤':¤E¤rv. F? ogéness TS rziusxgdto
icshahj on th; Exaszs of personal ; exrooeziod bo €»xlo{o.m and oommwf: on evidence cjsvm by otihcrs. Ei- mo?
noi: be deaf uihe/Chef cx Séoécmwt bz? an Gdv0c¢f¢·wz}£n4ss Shcu{d
be 1‘;c1»*(2n QQ Froogc Or #28 cir; wmhggrg g#·d·,g
HOPMQHH woufd houe cz conf/{af; cya mteresi m ffhct Sho woulofbe
czdvoccr':M Iaohéues were iueojolj L..,h£/o at fha sam; imo c5,·v»?:% wines: thor': she)
horse/R was responsnbfe Hr odw·:o>,·§ , or ¢`o»`/o>:% ’$° oedwice, Chow wc the
Ul7€-U2 @¢b€‘¥¥S 6/FIB! fc?/¢U€S; D4 woacii, l+0·Pm&’rrr7 Yhdlj have, 630
undue entoresb rh thm: cose as sho rb cowy-ng/.2 o defmdchzi rh giggg
v. State cf Ammo, MO, Cu 02-r26o»P4—fs¢~ SEE. defmo/mj dvesre vwj c/cumc
cijcuhst hor,
Y? be <’J¢c1O Ho-Fmonn F/mj; 0* 0/uc! mfe 0/I @@2 ¤¤{V·'$»‘¤@ mem
as to the lec6c*J·hJ of thm- loo/@9 and lcfxr as an adwcoé; ohth;
Pvhb-J, Boyd on Ehrs, She hos cc /2%:1//.9 guojqxzoable mdzcrest m tho:
`
sho Knew néjwcs rlifgjor/U/;{¤{,,1{}{ but ·Po.f/ed éc scr? Grr`Ch»h¤§..
Z.
Case 2:O3—cv—O2150-SRB—I\/IEA D0cument118 Filed O2/23/2006 Page20f3

ouéoommlcnd mm? be ojzcdqlaozlng aolwsm? low clrenii based on doot rbferesb
érvm `Claaf l’l’O\Ll’Vl¢2!‘?r7 will be co wrknesgf her rémovd FS rrece:.sar%,
[,oI».,`lo doe Gommmz': Lo Etzlmizcl HJ.; 3.7 Sécécs (kai. nf lg llovémanné does?
lm wfdaclrczwl sho has not done so even m lsvght o·P her aoévom lf; vchao
modus. Tn dom Sztucbons, Elec E‘Cl7r?-al 7?» bo Seek. Femcvdl. [5;; commméib Edwhcnl Edo ld),
The; moborn ls not brought lor du Iowrooses of glqmé, or harassment,
xlfwrdrhfycy, dqrs Court musé order /—lolmon,q§ remove:} as D·c·Fmse..
Gxmszl rh Chr: Case,.
’|?ESP’EC1'F0}~L\{ SuBr#1HTED dqisji da? of FEbruczr¢2¢5, 2006,-
Kevm Mrcemex. Foy, .EL2’..<¢> L5
zvm fY7·??o<-6, cbm ` .
0F€o.o»41. al om Go oF¤'o¢
l '-A milled chrs goo?
{Z0!
TTL0 Honorable (Susan TE. 13ol·éorr
unoud Sfcics Dmtrwct judge
and OLE--l°l?lJE Hub c»;>??6cT‘ Cow
moflad {19%
wc ol E. Holman
Flttgrrfcv lor Defervgléwlss.
15*/=
l
l
Case 2:O3—cv—O2150-SRB-I\/IEA D0cume%t118 Filed O2/23/2006 Page30f3

Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA

Document 118

Filed 02/23/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA

Document 118

Filed 02/23/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02150-SRB-MEA

Document 118

Filed 02/23/2006

Page 3 of 3