Free Motion to Supplement - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 65.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 28, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 545 Words, 3,426 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35248/290-1.pdf

Download Motion to Supplement - District Court of Arizona ( 65.2 kB)


Preview Motion to Supplement - District Court of Arizona
FILED ____ LODGED .
RECEIVED __“_ COPY
l James W. Fidd
1>.o. our 24s DEC 2 8 2006
2 85348 CLERK U S —
BY ¤mCPé?£2l2ii§r$l’“l r
3 ——-————-........_e,_i?>r;:1=:¤?);_i,_r_;»,
4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
S 1 FOR 'IHE. DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
1 6 _
T 1 James W. Field, ) Case No.: CV03-2214-PHX—SRB
)
8 Plaintiff )
_ } 1 ’ MOTION REQUESTING
9 vs. ) COURTS PERMISION TO SUP
) DAMAGE DISCLOSURE PURSUANT T0 .
10 Brad Weekley et. aL, ) FED.R.CIV.P. 26(e)(1) (FORCIBLE
) DETAINER JUDGMENT)
ll Defendant )

12
13 Comes now Plainti&Q mentioned above, the Courts Permission to Supplement his
I4 Damage Disclosure pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e)(l)
15 (e) SUPPLEMENTATION OF DISCLOSURES AND RESPONSES. A party
who has made a disclosure under subdivision (a) or responded to
I6 a request for discovery with a disclosure or response is under a
duty to supplement or correct the disclosure or response to include
U information thereafter acquired if ordered by the court or in
the following circumstances:
is (1)./itpartyisirrideradutyto supplernentatapproprhtei11ten*valsitsdisclosn1res.»
under subdivision (al ifthe @3; learns that in som: materia1res@ the.
19 information disclosed is incorgplete or incorrect and if the or
corrective inzformation has nototherwise beenrnade ktmwnto theotlrer parties
20 dg} the diseo@ process or in
21
22 U For the purpose of ealculatable damages Plaintiff supplements his Disclosure with the
23 Judgments out ofthe La Paz County Superior Court in a Forcible Detainer Action in which
24 Plaintiff lost his property after 15 years due to not being able to make his property payments i
25 _ because ofthe Actions ofthe Defendants closing his property down by IC!'I®l8Iii'lg the Electric »
with out notice.
1 -1-
Case 2:03—cv—02214—SFlB Document 290 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 2

i .*5.* l
I James W. Field CV03-2214—PI+IX-SRB-
Pro Se Plaintiff Supplemental Judgment
2 .
Y
Plaintiff submits 2 Judgrmnts- one is a Forcible Detainer Judgment and the other is for
4
`At`lZ01’B£)/"S Fees. ·
5
in For the purpose of Emotional and Mental Damages these documents are prcofofthat, What
6
is the price for the e t oflosing your property after 15 years, in a connnunity with a
7 ‘ .
8 population of 1,000 ‘? What’s the price of having to everyday for 4 years ask your neighbors to use
there shower or there toilet.
9
Respectfully submitted this 3 Q day of December 2006- .
10
11 _ .
I2 Se~Plaintiii`, James W,. Fieid -
13 -
ORIGINAL and. One Copy ofthe foregoing
14 0 sem this QM day arneccmber zoos with
15 Sandra Day O’Connor Federal Courthouse l
· Suite 130 "
*6 - 401 wwasmagmn-si.sPc1 _
Phx. AZ. 85003
. 17
18] A Copy ofthe foregoing sent
This day of December 2006 to
T9 Jones, Skelton & Hochuli
20 n 2901 N. Cemral Ave.
Suite 800
21 Phx. AZ. 85012 a
22 A 'Gaona Law F inn A A
3101 N. Central Ave; i
23 SIHIB 720 _
Phx. Az. 85012
2.4 . .
25 BY A `
Tammy Doud
PIa:i11tifFs’ Assistant
.2.
Case 2:03—cv—02214—SFlB Document 290 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB

Document 290

Filed 12/28/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB

Document 290

Filed 12/28/2006

Page 2 of 2