Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

Lydia A. Jones - 017178 ROGERS & THEOBALD LLP 2 The Camelback Esplanade, Suite 850 2425 East Camelback Road 3 Phoenix, Arizona 85016
4 5

1

Telephone: (602) 852-5582 [email protected]

Michael J. O'Connor - 010399 JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, PLC 6 The Collier Center, 11th Floor 201 E. Washington Street 7 Phoenix, AZ 85004
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Telephone: (602) 262-5889 [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ARIZONA DISTRICT KAYE HUTTON, as an individual and representative of a class consisting of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. No. CV2003-2262-PHX-ROS PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF RECENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY RE: PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Kaye Hutton, as an individual and representative of a class consisting of others similarly situated, hereby provides notice that the recent published decision in Takacs v. A. G. Edwards and Sons, Inc., 444 F. Supp. 2d 1100 (S.D. CA August 2006) supports Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: 1. Section III (A) Client Managers Were Not Paid a Salary Basis ­ Therefore Client Managers Cannot be Exempt;
Case 2:03-cv-02262-ROS Document 311 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

2. Section III (B) The Client Manager's Primary Duty Was Sales ­ Therefore Client Managers Cannot be Exempt; 3. Section III (C) Client Managers Did Not Regularly Exercise Discretion & Independent Judgment; 4. Section III (D) In any event, there is a Genuine Issue of Material Fact as to Whether Client Managers Were Paid on a Salary Basis, Whether The Client Manager's Primary Duty Was Sales, and Whether the Client Manager Regularly Exercised Discretion & Independent Judgment 5. Section VIII Summary Judgment is Not Appropriate on the State Law Treble Damages Claim; 6. Section VIII(A) Plaintiff's State Law Claims are Not Preempted by the FLSA; 7. Section VIII(B) Treble Damages under State Law Are Applicable; and 8. Section VI The Statute of Limitations is Three Years. DATED this 26th day of October, 2006. ROGERS & THEOBALD, LLP

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

By /s/ Lydia A. Jones

Lydia A. Jones The Camelback Esplanade, Suite 850 2425 East Camelback Road Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Telephone: (602) 852-5582 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, PLC Michael J. O'Connor The Collier Center, 11th Floor 201 E. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85004 Telephone: (602) 262-5889 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 2:03-cv-02262-ROS

Document 311 2 Filed 10/26/2006

Page 2 of 3

1

I hereby certify that on this 26th day of October, 2006, I electronically transmitted to the clerk's office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a notice of electronic filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: 3 4 Charles L. Chester Ryley Carlock & Applewhite 5 One North Central Avenue, Suite 1200 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4417 6 Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America, N.A.
2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

By: /s/ Gia Altreche

Case 2:03-cv-02262-ROS

Document 311 3 Filed 10/26/2006

Page 3 of 3