Free Objection - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 57.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 552 Words, 3,285 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35327/103-2.pdf

Download Objection - District Court of Arizona ( 57.4 kB)


Preview Objection - District Court of Arizona
ATTACHMENT A
Case 2:03—cv—02300-ROS D0cument103-2 Filed 07/14/2006 Page10f2

\•v xi
Liz Slaughter-Payne, PHOENIX VAMC. (602)277-5551 ext. 695S
PVA# DEPT CLOSING POSITION SERIESIGRADE
. DAT E TITLE
'/___.f""_““`°*v °
{ 99·0Q3B1 z' IKM 2-5-99 COMPUIER SPEC GS-334-5171*9 —-9*
98-00731 IRM I-30-98 COMPUTER SPEC GS-334-7/9
98-·022B3 OFF DIR 2-11-98 ADMIN OFF 65-341-9/ I1
93-02831 ERS 3-I0-98 COMPUTER SPEC INST GS·334-9
98-060131 IR!vI 4-- 8-98 COMPUTER SPEC GS-334-7/9/I I
98- l 14Bl IRM 4-I0-98 COMPUTER SPEC GS-344-7/9
98-10581 IRM] 5-22-98 COMPUTER SPEC GS-344-9/11/12
98-166Bl IRM 7-l0~98 COMPUTER SPEC GS-3 44-7/9
98-1373 HRMD 7-14-98 PER MGMT SPEC GS-201-9/1 I Cancelled
98- l45B3 OPI 7-15-98 PROGRAM ANALYST GS-343-9/ll
’ 98-165BI IRM 7-17-98 COMZPUTER SPEC GS-334-9/I1
[ 98-152133 3 ICS 8-5-98 SECURTIY ASST 03-086-7
` 98-204BI IRM 10-16-98 COMPUTER SPEC (38-334-9/l I
8-214132 HRMD ll-3-98 PER MGMT SPEC GS·201—7f9/11 Cancelled
97-032B2 VISN #18 4-7-97 ADMIN OFF GS-341-7f9 ·
97-04731 MH&BSS 5-2-97 MED ADMJN SPC 63-301-7/9
97-06891 IRM 6-20-97 COMPUTER SPEC GS-334-9/I 1
97-1 15Bl IRM 9-19-97 COMPUTER SPEC GS~334-9/l 1
< 97-13781 IRM 11-3-97 COMPUTER SPEC GS-334-7/9
97-139Bl ERS 1 I-4-97 COMPUTER SPEC INST G8—334·9
97-14831 IRM 11-15-97 COMPUTER SPEC I GS-334-9/1 I
97-17531 IRM 12-31-97 COMPUTER SPEC 65-334-9/ll
I have been subjected to race discrimination, harassment, and reprisal when I was not selected
for any of the above positions. The agency has asserted that the pcrson’s selected was the best-
qualihed candidates. I feel the agency has exaggerated the Selected‘s qualiication while casting
a negative light on mc.
I am alleging that the agency’s reason are pretextual, based on several factors including the
Endings of the EEO Counselor who conducted a factdinding on a previous complaint The
Counselor found several discrepancies whether there was a vacant position; was there a selection
made; and who was selected for the position? Dona Tyson who was the supervisor at that time
stated that she had referred me to Mr. Moore as one ofthe selected for one of the Computer
Specialist, GS-334-7/9/11 positions. Mr. Moore states that I was never selected by anyone. The
Human Resource Personnel stated that the positionwas never announced and was still vacant at
the time ofthe Counselor’s fact-finding process. Above all no notice of selection was sent to me
for any of the Computer Specialist Position in the IRM Department as of March 17, 199.
ln addition, to my previous EEO activities I will base the discriminatory actions on the
atmosphere at this facility, which is racially tense and that this facilities Management Staff
rcsents the use ofthe EEO process by employees. The Management Sta.&` at this facility, does
not support the EEO Program in whole, especially the Black Employee Program, Hispanic
Employee Program or The People with Disabilities Program.
Case 2:03—cv—02300-ROS Document 103-2 Filed O7/14/2006 Page RTQTAQHMENT A

Case 2:03-cv-02300-ROS

Document 103-2

Filed 07/14/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02300-ROS

Document 103-2

Filed 07/14/2006

Page 2 of 2