Free Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

EXHIBIT D
Case 2:O3—cv—O2300—ROS Document 88-5 Filed O4/13/2006 Page10f4

I PAUL K. CHARLTON
United States Attomey
2 District of Arizona
JOHN R. MAYFIELD
3 Assistant U.S. Attomey
’%“°§2£E2§3£1ré“%a§L848
4 40vNorth Central Agenue, Suite 1200 (
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408
5 Telephone: (602) 514-7500
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7
8 Martha Slaughter—Payne,
CIV—03—2300—PHX—ROS
9 Plaintiff,
DEFENDANT’S 26(A){E
10 v. F.R. CIV. P. DISCLOSU S
(Supplemental)
11 Anthony Principi, Secretary, Department of
Veterans Affairs,
A 12 Defendant.
1 3 Defendant, Anthony Principi, Secretary Department of Veteran’s Affairs, by and through
1 V . .
4 the United States Attorney and the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, make the
15 following initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
1 6
in the above matter:
1 .
7 1. Rule 26(a)(1)(A) - Individuals likely to have discoverable information relevant
1
8 to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings.
1 .
9 The N0n—SeIect10n Case (Agency Case N0. 2OOP-2674)
0
2 Richard E. Moore: Responsible Management Official and head of Information Resources
21 . .
Management at the time of the non—select1on.
22 Robert Pyle: Selectee.
3
2 Robert L. Jones: Responsible Management Official and the supervisor to whom
24 . . . .
rev1ew1ng the applications was delegated.
25 Ron Webb: HR employee .
6 .
2 Nancy Campbell: HR supervisor of Ron Webb.
2
7 Richard E. Moore: Responsible Management Official and head of Information Resources
28
Case 2:O3—cv-O2300—ROS Document as-5 Filed 04/1 3/2006 Page 2 eF%""B'T D

1 Management at the time of the non—selection.
2 » Robert Pyle: Selectee.
3 Robert L. Jones: Responsible Management Official and the supervisor to whom
4 reviewing the applications was delegated.
5 Ron Webb, retired from VA.
6 Nancy Campbell: HR supervisor of Ron Webb.
7 The Transfer Case (Agency Case No. 2OOP-0644-2002100409)
8 John Fears — Director, Carl T. Hayden VAMC.
9 Laurel Van Haldren — Administrator, Mental Health & Behavioral Sciences.
10 Rafael Martinez — Human Resources Officer.
11 Martin Lieberman — Assistant Human Resources Officer.
12 Amy Taylor — Human Resources Specialist.
13 Max Avilez — Employee Labor Relations Coordinator.
14 Judith Law — Human Resources Management Specialist.
15 And such other persons that are identified and located during the course of
16 discovery insofar as their testimony or knowledge may be deemed relevant and material tothe
17 issues and matters in this action.
1 8 S upplem ental ;
19 Donald Huckaby
Chief, IRM
20 VA Eastem Colorado Health Care System(ECHCS)
1055 Clermont St. (IRMS)
21 Denver, CO 80220
22
Mr. Huckaby is expected to testify to VA Information Resources Management Service policies,
23 practices and procedures in general and with specific reference to issues in this lawsuit.
24 Mike Jones
Former Chief of Information Resources Management Service
25 Carl T. Hayden VAMC “
retired
26 Colorado Springs, Colorado
A 27 Mr. Jones is expected to testify to VA Information Resources Management Service policies,
8 practices and procedures in general and with specific reference to issues in this lawsuit.
2
Case 2:O3—cv—O2300—ROS Document 88-5 Filed O4/13/2006 Page 3 of 4

1 Supplemental:
2 Mauricio G. Ponce
HRM Service Chief
3 WJB Dom VAMC
6439 Gamers Feny Road
4 Columbia, SC 29209
5 Mr. Ponce is expected to testify to VA Human Resources policies, procedures and
practices.
6
2. Rule 26(a)(1)(B) — A co y of, or a description by category and location of, all
7 documents, data compilations, and) tan ible things 1n the possession, custody or control of
the party that are relevant to disputed fgcts alleged with articularity in the pleadings.
8 The entire administrative record and any and all d)ocuments, including but not limited
to, all listed or contained in the N0n—Selecti0n Case 5Agency Case N0. 200P—26 74) and the
9 Transfer Case (Agency Case N0. 200P—0644-2002] 0409) or referred to therein in, insofar as
they may be deemed relevant and material to the issues and matters in this action. Any and
10 all] additional and relevant documents or other items identified during the course of
iscovery.
11 Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 26(a)§1)(B), documents relevant to the disputed facts
alleged in this case have been produce in the prior EEOC case involved in this dispute
12 which should already be in the ossession of the plaintiff.
The defendant reserves gre right to supplement this disclosure during the course of
13 discovery and issue id ntification.
Dated this [2 g day of November 2005.
14 7
s PAUL K. CHARLTON
15 United tes Attorn /
Dis ` of/ ` if a ’
16 V ,r*‘ 4 yi Q/{ ,
17 rs’ii . M IELD
Assistant U. · Attorney
18 Original and cop of the foregoing
9 mailed this y of November 2005, to:
1
Rosval A. Patterson
20 Attorney at Law
Patterson & Associates, P.C.
21 777 East Thomas Road # 210
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
22 Attorney for plaintiff
23 Dana_Heck, Attorney
Office of Regional Counsel
24 Department of Veterans Affairs
650 East Indian School Road, Building 24
25 phoenix, Arizona 85012-1839
3225 North Central Avenue, Room 305
26 Phoenix, A ,~- na 8501 .
27 7
28 /
Case 2:O3—cv—O2300—ROS Document 88-5 Filed O4/13/2008 Page 4 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-02300-ROS

Document 88-5

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-02300-ROS

Document 88-5

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-02300-ROS

Document 88-5

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-02300-ROS

Document 88-5

Filed 04/13/2006

Page 4 of 4