Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

Daniel P. Struck, Bar #012377 Rachel Love Halvorson, Bar #019881 J ONES, S KELTON & H OCHULI, P.L.C. 2901 North Central Avenue Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Telephone No.: (602) 263-1700 Facsimile No.: (602) 263-1784 E-Mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants Corrections Corporation of America and Stolc Leon Schydlower, Esq L AW O FFICE O F L EON S CHYDLOWER 210 North Campbell Street El Paso, Texas 79901 and Brett Duke, Esq. L AW O FFICES OF B RETT D UKE 4157 Rio Bravo El Paso, Texas 79902 Attorneys for Plaintiff Cheryl Allred IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Cheryl Allred Plaintiff, v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.; Bruno Stolc Defendants. Defendants Corrections Corporation of America and Warden Stolc, together with Plaintiff, hereby submit the Parties' Amended Deposition Designations To Be Presented At Trial. The deposition designations and corresponding objections set forth herein amend those designations set forth in the parties Joint Proposed Pretrial Order filed January 4, 2006. This same date, the parties provide the Court with color-coded copies of the deposition designations and objections. Defendants' designations are NO. CIV 03-2343 PHX-DGC PARTIES' AMENDED DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS TO BE PRESENTED AT TRIAL

Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC

Document 167

Filed 01/24/2006

Page 1 of 46

presented in blue, Plaintiff's designations are presented in yellow and those designations to which the parties agree is set forth in green. I. PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS A. Deposition of Thomas Bauman 1. Page 14 15 16 18 19 19 22 23 2. Page None. B. Deposition of Christine Castriotta 1. Page 7 8 8 9 12 Plaintiff's Designations Lines 20-25 1-4 16-25 1-15 24-25 Plaintiff's Deposition Designations Lines 3-10 3-15 5-23 22-25 1-3 20-22 15-20 1-3 Defendants' Objections Lines Objection

2 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 2 of 46

13 19 21 22 22 23 24 25 27 29 34 35 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 42 42 43 44

1-10 18-22 13-25 1-3 15-25 1-25 1-25 1-14 1-9 1-17 1-11 1-25 3-14 22-24 1-15 22-25 1-2 8-25 1-7 20-25 1-7 5-10 19-25 13-19 1-4

3 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 3 of 46

45 49 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 65 66 67 68 69 71 72 73

8-25 6-24 15-24 10-18 2-25 1-25 1-25 1-10 11-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 14-23 9-15 21-22 11-25 1-25 3-6 20-25 7-25 1-25 1-8

4 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 4 of 46

2. Page 42 45

Defendants' Objections Line 5-10, 19-25 8-25 Objection Relevance, foundation, 401, 402, 403 Foundation, 608 speculation, 401, 402, 403,

49 52 54

18-24 15-24 2-3

Relevance, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403 Relevance, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403 Relevance, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, 106

55

4-25

Leading, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, misstates evidence

56

1-2, 22-25

Leading, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, misstates evidence

58

11-25

Leading, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, misstates evidence

60

9-25

Leading, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, misstates evidence

61

1-25

Leading, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, misstates evidence

62

1-3

Leading, foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, misstates evidence

63 64 67

21-25 14-23 13-25

Relevance, 401, 402, 403 Relevance, foundation, 401, 402, 403 Leading, foundation, speculation, relevance, 401, 402, 403

5 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 5 of 46

68

3-6

Relevance, foundation, incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403

69

20-25

Relevance, foundation, incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403

71

16-25

Foundation, speculation, 401, 402, 403, 608

C.

Deposition of Dan Judisak 1. Page 23 40 2. Page None. Plaintiff's Designations Lines 1-5 1-13 Defendants' Objections Lines Objections

D.

Deposition of Ron Travers 1. Page 6 6 10 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff's Designations Lines 17-19 24-25 6-8 7-25 17-25 1-10; 16-18 2-5; 9-19

6 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 6 of 46

25 30 33 36 37 38 39 41 2. Page 6

8-10 10-17 5-9 12-19 2-8 19-34 10-32 9-14 Defendants' Objections Line 24-25 Objection Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

7

1-2

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

10

6-8

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

E.

Deposition of Paul Davis 1. Page 6 7 10 11 12 Plaintiff's Designations Line 1-25 1 1-19 12-20 9-13; 21

7 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 7 of 46

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 30 31 32 33 34 35 37 2. Page 6

1-3; 19; 22-25 9-10; 15-22 1-3; 22 3-17 2 23 12-23 7-12 18-25 16-22 24 8; 20-25 1-5 22-24 12-16 1-14; 25 1 1-8 1-25 1-6 16-25 Defendants' Objections Line 1, 20, 24-25 Objection Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

8 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 8 of 46

14 15 18 21 28 34 35

1-3, 19, 22-25 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 22 23 18 22-24 1-2 2-6 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Argumentative, misstates evidence, leading, 401, 402, 403

37

6, 21

Incomplete, 106, legal argument/objection of counsel, 401, 402, 403

F.

Deposition of Steve Yarborough 1. Page 5 6 7 10 18 19 20 21 23 24 27 Plaintiff's Designations Line 8-12 12-25 1-5 9-15 1-21 4-7 8-24 7-18 13-17 3-4; 13 14-18

9 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 9 of 46

34 35 36 37 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 64 65

1-11 1-13 10-13 12-19 21-24 16-19; 20-25 1-14 12-25 1-2; 13-18; 19-22 9-21 1-14 14-25 3-20 15-18; 20-25 5-7; 18-23 3-10 10-18 13-16; 24-25 4-14; 15-17 14-25 6-25 9-25 1-17 14-25 1-8

10 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 10 of 46

68 2. Page 6

6-12 Defendants' Objections Line 12-25 Objection Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

10

9-15

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

18

1-21

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

36

10-13

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

41

20-25

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

42

1-14

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

43

18, 19, 25

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

46

19-21

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

47

4-14

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

52 55

18 10-18

Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

11 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 11 of 46

57

10-12

Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

59

6-8, 24-25

Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403

G.

Deposition of John Callegari 1. Page 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 23 24 26 27 28 36 Plaintiff's Designations Line 7-25 1-16 3-6 4-7; 12-22 17-23 3-15 12-24 16-25 1-25 7-9 15-24 16-17 7-16; 22-25 1-3 17-22 9-12 13-25 5-6

12 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 12 of 46

2. Page None. H.

Defendants' Objections Line Objection

Deposition of Kristy Dromgoole 1. Page 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 24 25 27 28 29 Plaintiff's Designations Line 19-25 1-18 5-25 1-25 1-25 12-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 8-25 1-25 20-25 1-25 11-22 15-25 1-25 15-24 1-25

13 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 13 of 46

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 49 50 51 53 54 55 56 58 65 66

25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-11 1-3 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 13-25 20-21, 25 1-11 5-25 1-19 9-25 1-25 10-22 1-9, 15-17 1-25 1-5 11-18 1-18 6-25 1-23

14 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 14 of 46

67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 2. Page 33

1-25 6-25 1-2, 14-25 1-25 1-25 1-5, 7-25 1-2, 11-25 1-25 1-18 Defendants' Objections Line 23-24 Objection Legal argument/objection by counsel, relevance, 401, 402, 403

34 53 58 66 72

4-11 15-17 15-18 6-9 10-25

Misstates evidence, argumentative, 401, 402, 403 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Incomplete, 106, 401, 402, 403 Foundation, 401, 402, 403 Foundation, speculation, misstates evidence, 401, 402, 403

75

3-10

Foundation, 401, 402, 403

I.

Deposition of Queta Van W yngarden

This treating medical provider is a nonretained expert. This nonretained expert agreed in her deposition that she would voluntarily avail herself to testify in this trial. If this nonretained expert that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over becomes

15 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 15 of 46

unavailable for trial, the Plaintiff reserves her right to present the entire deposition testimony of this deponent. Defendants' objection: Relevance, foundation, speculation, hearsay, 401, 402, 403, 702. See Defendants' Motion in Limine to exclude testimony of Queta VanW yngarden.

II.

DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS A. Deposition of Steve Yarborough 1. Page 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Defendants' Designations Line 1-7, 20-25 1-24 6-25 1-21 2-25 1-8, 15-25 1-21 4-25 7-25 1-19, 21-25 1-25 1-4, 6-19, 22-25 1-11, 13-24 22-25 1-23

16 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 16 of 46

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 44 45 46

1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-21, 23-25 1-4, 6-25 1-10, 15, 17-25 1-11, 12-25 1-2, 14-25 1-25 1-13, 15-25 1-21, 23-25 1-13 1-9 1-24 1-3 8-25 1-11, 13-25 1-19 23-25 1-21, 23-24 23-25

17 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 17 of 46

50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 66 67 68 2.

3-25 3-22, 24-25 1-17, 22-25 1-7, 10-24 3-10, 13-25 1-10, 13-25 1, 12-17, 21-25 1-9, 15-25 1-13 16-23 3-15 1 1-23 Plaintiff's Objections

General Objection: Prior to the deposition of this deponent, the U.S. Department of Justice, through the Office of the United States Attorney, limited the permissible scope of the deposition to "(a): Whether the Plaintiff reported the alleged rape to you. (b) If she did report the rape, what details did Plaintiff give you. (c) If she did report the rape, what services, if any, were provided to Plaintiff as a result of the report of the rape." Exhibit "1" of the deposition of Steve Yarborough.

This deponent did not testify at his deposition that the Plaintiff reported the alleged rape to him. When specifically asked: "Q. Did Cheryl Allred report the rape to you? A. Not to me directly. She reported a rape in my

18 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 18 of 46

presence. Q. Did she report it to you? A. No." (page 46, lines 24-25, page 47, lines 1-3) Throughout the deposition, counsel for Plaintiff made the objection that the testimony was beyond the scope set by the U.S. Department of justice. See page 4, 10, 11, 17-18, 18, 36, 37, 41, 43, 45. Page 5 Line 1-25 Objection No objection to lines 1-13. Objection to lines 14 25: Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. 7 6-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. 8 1-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. 9 1-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. 10 1-8, 15-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. 11 1-21 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. 12 4-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. 13 7-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

19 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 19 of 46

14

1-19, 21-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

15

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 801, 802.

16

1-19, 22-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

17

1-11, 13-24

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

18 19

22-25 1-23 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

20

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

21

1-3, 19-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

22

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

20 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 20 of 46

23

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

24

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

25

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

26

1-26

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

27

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

28

1-4, 6-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

29

1-29, 13-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

30

1-11, 12-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

21 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 21 of 46

31

1-2, 14-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

32

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

33

1-13, 15-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

34

1-21, 23-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

35

1-13

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

36

1-9

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

37

1-24

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

38

1-3

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

22 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 22 of 46

39

8-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

40

1-11, 13-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

41

1-19

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

44

23-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

45

1-21, 23-24

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

55

1-10, 13-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

56

1, 12-17, 21-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

57

1-9, 15-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

23 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 23 of 46

58

1-13

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

59

16-23

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

61

17-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

66

3-15

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

68

1-23

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

B.

Deposition of Paul Davis 1. Page 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Defendants' Designations Line 1-25 1-25 21-23 1-25 6-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25

24 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 24 of 46

13 14 15 16 17 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 2. Page 4

1-10 6-25 1-17 2, 18-25 1-4 7-25 1-12 1-25 1-4, 7-12, 14-15, 17-25 2-15, 17-23, 25 1-11, 13-14, 17-18, 20-23, 25 1-25 1-25 1-8 1-10, 12-19, 21-25 1-15, 17-25 1-3, 5-25 1 15-25 16-25 1 Plaintiff's Objections Line 1-25 Objection Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

25 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 25 of 46

5

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

6

21-23

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

7

1-25

Lines 2-25: Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

8

6-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

9

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

13

1-10

Lines 15-25: Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. 602 801, 802.

14

15-25

Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. 602 801, 802.

15

1-17

Lines 15-17: Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

16

2, 18-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602, 801, 802.

19

7-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

26 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 26 of 46

20

1-12

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

22

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

23

1-4, 7-12, 14-15, 17-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion,

Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. 24 2-15, 17-23, 25 Lines 2-15: Relevance, Prejudice,

Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. 25 1-11, 13-14, 17-18, 20-23, 25 Relevance, Prejudice,

Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. 26 1-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. 27 1-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

27 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 27 of 46

28

1-8

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

32

1-3, 5-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

35

15-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

C.

Deposition of Ron Travers 1. Page 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Defendants' Designations Line 1-7, 19-25 1-25 1-19 14-25 1-25 25 1-25 1-25 1-8, 10-25 1-25 1-18, 20-25 1-25 1-25 1-7, 17-25

28 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 28 of 46

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 49

1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1­25 1-12, 15-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-9, 15-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-24 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-24 1-21 10-19

29 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 29 of 46

2. Page 5

Plaintiff's Objections Line 1-25 Objection Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

6

1-19

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

7

14-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

8

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

11

25

Privilege: Fifth

Amendment.

Relevance,

Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. 12 1-25 Privilege: Fifth Amendment. Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. 13 1-25 Privilege: Fifth Amendment. Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. 15 1-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. See Fed. R. See Fed. R. See Fed. R.

30 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 30 of 46

16

1-18, 20-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

28

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

29

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

31

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

33

1-25, 15-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

34

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

35

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

36

1-25

Privilege: Fifth Amendment. Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. See Fed. R.

31 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 31 of 46

37

1-24

Privilege: Fifth Amendment. Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802. See Fed. R.

42

1-21

Privilege: Fifth Amendment. Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Know ledg e, H ears ay. Se e Fe d. R . Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

49

10-19

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

D.

Deposition of Thomas Bauman 1. Page 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 Defendants' Designations Line 1-9 12-25 1-24 1-8 1-25 1-25 1-13, 23-25 1-25 1-25 4-25

32 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 32 of 46

14 15 16 18 19 20 2. Page 4

1, 3-25 1-15 1-11, 13-23 15-25 1-25 1-6 Plaintiff's Objections Line 12-25 Objection Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

8

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

9

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

10

1-13, 23-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

11

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

12

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

33 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 33 of 46

13

4-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

14

1, 3-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

16

1-11, 13-23

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

18

15-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

19

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

20

1-6

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

E.

Deposition of Dan Judiscak 1. Page 4 5 6 Defendants' Designations Line 1-19 21-25 1-4, 8-25

34 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 34 of 46

7 8 9 10 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 2. Page 9

1-16, 21-25 1-25 1-25 1-7, 18-25 18-25 1 9-25 1-25 1-13 18-25 1-25 1-6, 24-25 1-3 4-25 1-15 11-25 1-25 1-9 19-22 Plaintiff's Objections Line 1-25 Objection Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

10

1-7, 16-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

35 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 35 of 46

11

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

12

1, 5-11, 18-25 Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

13

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

14

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

15

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

16

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

17

1-17

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

18

1-3, 18-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

19

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

20

1-6, 24-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

21

1-3, 17-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

22

1-25

Lines 1-3, 8-25: Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See F ed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

36 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 36 of 46

24

11-25

Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 602, 801, 802.

25

1-25

Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 602, 801, 802.

28

19-22

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

30

11-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

31

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

32

1-5, 8-9

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

F.

Deposition of Christine Castriotta 1. Page 4 7 8 9 10 Defendants' Designations Line 7-15 24-25 1-25 1-25 1-25

37 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 37 of 46

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 35 36

12-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-6, 14-25 1-25 1-25 1-6, 22-25 1-25 1-7, 12-25 1-7 15-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-14, 22-25 1-23 19-25 1-17 14-25 1-3, 24-25 1-25 1-25

38 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 38 of 46

37 38 39 40 41 44 45 72 2. Page 16

1-25 1-25 1-2 8-25 1-12 24-25 1 18-24 Plaintiff's Objections Line 1-25 Objection Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

17

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

18

1-6, 22-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

24

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

25

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

26

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

27

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

39 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 39 of 46

28

1-14, 22-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

29

1-23

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

30

19-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

31

1-20

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

33

14-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

34

1-3, 24-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

35

1-25

Line 25: Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

36

1-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

40

8-25

Lines 8-12: Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

G.

Deposition of John Callegari 1. Page 4 5 6 Defendants' Designations Line 9-15 24-25 1-11, 18-25

40 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 40 of 46

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

1-25 1-25 1-2, 11-25 1-7, 12-22 9-25 1-4, 19-25 1-2, 16-25 1-25 1-15, 24-25 1-6 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 7-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-4, 22-25 1-3 9-25 3-6, 8-25 1-25 1-25 1-11

41 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 41 of 46

32 33 34 2. Page 30

3-24 1-25 1 Plaintiff's Objections Line 1-25 Objection Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

31

1-11

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

H.

Deposition of Kristy Dromgoole 1. Page 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 Defendants' Designations Line 7-12 1-25 1-25 1-9, 25 1-4, 10-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 8-20

42 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 42 of 46

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

18-25 1-25 1-4, 13-25 1-22 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 6-8 1-25 1-25 1-22 1-2, 25 2-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25

43 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 43 of 46

44 45 46 48 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 71 72

1-9, 20-25 1-4, 6-15 4-25 2-21 1-22 23-25 1-3, 19-25 1-25 1-25 1-5 21-25 15-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-9, 24-25 1-25 1-5, 16-25 1-25 1-2, 4-14 3-6 16-25 1-9

44 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 44 of 46

73 2. Page 33 51

1-2, 4-9 Plaintiff's Objections Line 1-22 1-22 Objection Lines 18-22: Form Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403.

57

21-25

Privilege, Attorney-Client Communication. Releva nce, Pre judice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602, 801, 802.

64

1-9, 24-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602, 801, 802.

66

16-25

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

67

1-4

Relevance, Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, Lack of Personal Knowledge, Hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 602 801, 802.

I.

Deposition of Gina Bauman Defendants reserve the right to present the deposition of Gina Bauman

at trial, should evidence presented at trial by Plaintiff require explanation by Gina Bauman or be required to refute evidence presented by Plaintiff with respect to any involvement by Gina Bauman in Plaintiff's criminal matter or rape allegations.

45 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 45 of 46

DATED this 24th day of January, 2006. JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULI, P.L.C.

By /s/ Rachel Love Halvorson Daniel P. Struck 2901 North Central Avenue Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Attorneys for Defendants Corrections Correction of America and Stolc By /s/ Rachel Love Halvorson for Leon Schydlower, Esq L AW O FFICE O F L EON S CHYDLOWER 210 North Campbell Street El Paso, Texas 79901 and Brett Duke, Esq. L AW O FFICES OF B RETT D UKE 4157 Rio Bravo El Paso, Texas 79902 Attorneys for Plaintiff Cheryl Allred Original of the foregoing e-filed with the Court and a copy e-served this 24th day of January 2006, to Leon Schydlower, Esq L AW O FFICE O F L EON S CHYDLOWER 210 North Campbell Street El Paso, Texas 79901 Brett Duke, Esq. L AW O FFICES OF B RETT D UKE 5970 Silver Springs Suite 700 El Paso, Texas 79912 Attorneys for Plaintiff Cheryl Allred s/Francine Gatto

46 Case 2:03-cv-02343-DGC Document 167 Filed 01/24/2006 Page 46 of 46