Free Order on Motion for Hearing - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

SRM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Andre Almond Dennison, Plaintiff -vsConrad Luna, et al., Defendant(s) CV-03-2373-PHX-SRB (JI) ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Under consideration is Plaintiff's Motion for Telephone Discovery Conference, filed June 13, 2005 (#64). Defendants have not responded to the motion. Plaintiff seeks a telephonic discovery conference with the Court to resolve various discovery disputes. It appears, however, that Defendants had not completed responding to Plaintiff's discovery disputes. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is premature and will be denied. Also under consideration is Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Discovery Requests, filed June 14, 2005 (#66). Defendants seek an extension until July 14, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests served May 10, 2005, citing efforts to supplement earlier responses. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, but indicates the need for a commensurate extension of the discovery motion deadline. The Court finds cause, and will simultaneously extend the discovery motion deadline. Plaintiff has now filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time (#68), seeking a sixty day extension of the June 16, 2005 deadline for filing discovery motions. Defendants have not responded to the motion. In light of the foregoing extension, the Court finds this motion to be moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Telephone Discovery Conference, filed June 13, 2005 (#64) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to
Case 2:03-cv-02373-SRB Document 70 - 1Filed 07/12/2005 Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Respond to Discovery Requests, filed June 14, 2005 (#66) is GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests on or before July 14, 2005. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall have until August 12, 2005 to file discovery and disclosure motions. In all other respects, the Court's scheduling Order, filed August 27, 2004 (#22) shall remain in effect. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time, filed June 20, 2005 (#68) is DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED: July 12, 2005
S:\Drafts\OutBox\03-2373-64o Order 05 07 06 re MDiscConf MExtend MExtend.wpd

_____________________________________ JAY R. IRWIN United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:03-cv-02373-SRB

Document 70 - 2Filed 07/12/2005 -

Page 2 of 2