Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________ EARL H. CARROLL United States District Judge v. ANTHONY RODGERS, et al. Defendants. Upon consideration of Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Two-week Extension to File Motion for Summary Judgment and for Enlargement of Page Limits, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants shall file their Motions for Summary Judgment and Responses to UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA SHARON NEWTON-NATIONS, et al. CIV-03-2506 PHX-EHC Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on April 22, 2008. 2. Plaintiffs shall file their Response to Defendants' Motions for Summary

Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on May 23, 2008. 3. 4. Defendants shall file their Replies on June 23, 2008. The page limit for defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and Responses

to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment shall be enlarged to 35 pages, and the page limit for the replies shall be enlarged to 30 pages. DATED this _____ day of _______________, 2008.

Case 2:03-cv-02506-EHC

Document 143-2

Filed 03/25/2008

Page 1 of 1