Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

_1 . UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, N0. 05-10110
D.C. No. CR-04-00245-PGR
Plaintiff — Appellee,
v.
JUDGMENT
JUAN CARLOS RAMOS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix).
This cause came on to be heard on the Transcript ofthe Record from the
United States District Court for the District ofA1*izona (Phoenix) and was duly
submitted. A
On consideration whereof} it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be, and hereby is
AFFIRMED. _ U
Filed and entered 07/26/06
A mus czopv
CATHY A. c:Arrsras0r~t
Clark of Court
ATTEST
. I AUG 1 7 2005 {
by: .- 6
Deputy Clary ·
Case 2:04-cr-00245-PGR Document 72 Filed O8 . . **1**0+*3*

4 an H .
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUL 26 2006
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS cAr1Jxép&pltR21;rg§§'g_r·éA%ERK
FOR THE NINT H CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-10110
Plaintiff- Appellee, D.C. No. CR-04-00245-PGR
v. .
MeMoRANouM*
JUAN CARLOS RAMOS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding
submitted Jttiy 24, 2006**
Before: ALARCON, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Juan Carlos Ramos appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 77-month
sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. "
Pursuant to Anders v. Calybrnitz, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Ramos
has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief] and a motion to withdraw
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be
` cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
M This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case 2:04-cr-00245-PGR Document 72 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 3

lg — - ,.. 5, .
as counsel of record. Ramos has not filed a pro se supplemental brief
Our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 83 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the dist1·ictcourt’s
judgment is AFFIRMED.
l V .
Case 2:04-cr-00245-PGR Document 72 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-00245-PGR

Document 72

Filed 08/17/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-00245-PGR

Document 72

Filed 08/17/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-00245-PGR

Document 72

Filed 08/17/2006

Page 3 of 3