Free Petition to Revoke Probation/Release - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

F_Frob12.frm
(Rev.12/04) -
W ..J _____ FILED _____ LODGED
BFCEIVED ____ COPY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT C • UR
D1sTR|cT OF ARIZONA CLEQRSTU s oisnam COURT
QY RIQT os araizowa _
i.~—.a..T`TIZ`I"C‘".f`IT‘j"f...,.Z.. .2,. —=—~
United States v. Reymundo lx/lENDOZA—TREJO Docket No. 04CR00388—001- " ' •
Pt’t' tR kS 'dRI —,·;` "
e 1 ion 0 evo e upervise e ease 7
COMES NOW PROBATION OFFICER ASSISTANT Alicia R. Pineda presenting an official report
on Reymundo IVIENDOZA-TREJO who was committed to the Bureau of Prisons June 28, 2004, by the
Honorable Roslyn O. Silver presiding in the District Court of Arizona. A 36-month period of supervised
release was imposed, and supervision commenced upon the offender's discharge from imprisonment
April 12, 2005. In addition to the general terms and conditions adopted by the court in General Order 05-
36, the offender was ordered to comply with the following special conditions:
1. If deported, you shall not re-enter the United States without legal authorization.
Reymundo IVIENDOZA-TREJO was convicted of Illegal Re-entry After Deportation, a violation of 8 USC
§1326(a) &(b)(2), a Class C felony.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT FOR CAUSE
AS FOLLOWS:
Allegation A. Violation of Special Condition No. 1: If deported, you shall not re-enter the United
States without legal authorization.
On or about January 28, 2006, l\/Iendoza-Trejo re—entered the United States without legal authorization.
This was evidenced by his January 28, 2006 arrest, by Border Patrol at or near Casa Grande, Arizona.
This arrest was subsequent to his April 12, 2005 deportation. Grade C Violation, §7B1.1(a)(3).
Case 2:O4—cr—OO388—ROS Document 20 Filed O3/13/2006 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 _.
U.S.A. v. Reymundo MENDOE-TREJO
Docket No. 04CROO388-001-PHX—ROS
February 16, 2006
AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER A WARRANT BE ISSUED
In conformance with the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Based on the information presented that the
offender has violated conditions of supervision, I am petitioning the Court to issue a warrant.
( Eié?f`2 Q . oz//é/¤ 4,
Alicia R. Pineda, Date
U.S. Probation Officer Assistant
Reviewed by .
— ·§`\-,,·fi .
der Oi-2 iluv/in rrr or *7 A
Lori A. Wantland Date
Supervisory U.S. Probation Officer
R wed by
. / aa;//A O¢¤
cki lr and Dat
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER OF COURT
I find there is probable cause to believe the offender has violated conditions of supervision, supported
by the above affirmation given under penalty o er'ury. The Court orders the issuance of a warrant.
Considered and ordered this QQQ day _ f J- , 20gjL and ordered filed and
made a part of the records in the above case.
` 2 E wx"
The ggggjable Réyn 0. Silver,
U.S. District Judge
‘·.¥i~i0?l?»“*.‘ l "’i’ i ill`}
Defense Counsel:
Deborah Euler-Ajayi ij: -** H Q`}
850 West Adams Street, Suite 201
Phoenix, Arizona 85007 _
A ._ l · _ Elf`:
Case 2:O4—cr—OO388—ROS Document 20 Filed O3/13/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cr-00388-ROS

Document 20

Filed 03/13/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cr-00388-ROS

Document 20

Filed 03/13/2006

Page 2 of 2