1
2
3
1 I 4
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
i 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 United States of America, I CR 04-860-4-PHX-ROS
I 10 Plaintiff, ORDER
l l vs.
12 l
Jose Parra Mariscal,
13 Defendant.
14 E
1 5 _
16 The Court has received defendants Motion to Dismiss Counsel and for Appointment
17 of New Counsel tiled on 6/6/05. Defendant is represented by counsel. It does not appear
18 that he conferred with his counsel of record in this matter. The Court finds that defendant
·_ 19 is ifgyiesefrlfediby counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 83.3(c), he must appear through
20 coiin`$i;iElilei¤dfore,
21 pursuant to Local Rule 83.3(c), striking defendanfs Motion to
_ 22 and for Appointment of New Counsel as improperly filed. Counsel may
23 re-urge if he finds it applicable. The Court will take no further action on the
24 dommm§i¥` l _
25 ______mjDiH this 5*h day of I . · 4* - .
I I _ lf l "
27 l i Maqli **7 .‘l {:?Q iA
United States Drstrict Court
28 l
· ase 2:O4—or-OO860—ROS Document 184 Filed O7/O8/2005 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cr-00860-ROS
Document 184
Filed 07/08/2005
Page 1 of 1