Free Notice of Appeal - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

DANIEL G. KNAUSS United States Attorney District of Arizona Michael A. Lee Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Two Renaissance Square 40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408 Arizona State Bar No. 018065 Telephone: (602) 514-7500 [email protected]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA United States of America, Plaintiff, NOTICE OF APPEAL v. Salvador Johnson, Defendant. Notice is hereby given that the United States of America, plaintiff above named, appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit the sentence of defendant, entered in this action on the 6th day of June, 2007. Respectfully submitted this 28th day of June, 2007. PAUL K. CHARLTON United States Attorney District of Arizona S/Michael A. Lee MICHAEL A. LEE Special Assistant U.S. Attorney D.Ct. No. CR-04-882-PHX-EHC

22 CERTIFICATE 23 I hereby certify that on June 28, 2007, I electronically transmitted the attached documents to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic 24 Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Neil Taylor. 25 S/Michael A. Lee 26 MICHAEL A. LEE 27 Special Assistant United States Attorney 28

Case 2:04-cr-00882-EHC

Document 127

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 Michael A. Lee hereby states:

DECLARATION

1. That he is a Special Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the prosecution of the above-captioned case; 2. That on June 6, 2007, a judgment and sentence order was entered by the United States

7 District Court Judge Earl H. Carroll. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 s/Michael A. Lee MICHAEL A. LEE Special Assistant U.S. Attorney I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 28th day of June, 2007. 3. That the United States is filing its notice of appeal on this date; 4. That the appeal is not being taken for purposes of delay; and 5. That the sentence ordered by the district court was an unreasonable sentence under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553.

Case 2:04-cr-00882-EHC

Document 127

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 2