_ FILED __7gLCIUGEtJ
____ RECILIVEU COPY
JUN 2 8 2000
ettisiit ti me 1 Hier COLJIITI"
o|s‘TIRit:·i‘ or-* Aiiizoma
nv __ _ _____ DEPLJTY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OP ARIZONA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CR 04-909-PI-Di-NVW
Plaintiff,
ORDER Re: MOTION To CONTINUE
g VS Rc: Change of Plea Date
Before the I-Ionorablc
JAMES R BAILEY, David Ii Duncan
Dctcndant.
Defendant moved this court for a continuance Re: Change of Plea Date of .]unc 27,
2005, and to reset the same for the reason that: l_)O`l:l.`JIlClt’lI1liS counsel neglected to calendar t.be change
of plea date and time and failed to contact DeI`endant to advise him of the date and time for the
change of plea. Tl IE COURT SPECIFIC/\LLY FINDS that the ends of justice served by granting
a continuance outweigh the best interest ol` the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This
finding is based upon the court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would deny
the defendant a reasonable opportunity necessary for effective representation, taking into account the
exercise of due diligence. IS USC § 3161 (h.)(I_)(xl).
I'I` IS ORDERED yacating the Change of Plea date of June 27, 2005, and resetting
if the Si°tfI1B·"f`O1` the l lmlday of 2005, at Q O‘·-2,‘3ni before this division.
E "i`i iii, li, _ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay pursuant to 18 USC §
i »-r· I ii-‘·` it
1 3i'=61·(itt*}(r$i)(`f3)(i') will result and that such delay is found to commence on the _ day of , 2005 ,
f`di·i`aitditi_iii ______ _,,__ _ days.
. ·r°-*.;_.._`lp ~ I I I " ' %
i an- ·_ DONE IN OPEN COURT this 3-*: __,_ y ___, day of_-iS`-'I\ · , 2005.
if; Sift I
iiii A
*:_g _ __ Q . David K Duncan
Magistrate Judge - Arlaena
Case 2:04-cr-00909-NVW Document 32 Filed 07/08/2005 Page 1 NTC ‘ PEER fl
Case 2:04-cr-00909-NVW
Document 32
Filed 07/08/2005
Page 1 of 1