Free Sentencing - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA - Phoenix DATE: 12/12/2005 CASE NUMBER:

CRIMINAL SENTENCING MINUTES CR 04-01050-004-PHX-JAT

Hon. JAMES A. TEILBORG, United States District Judge #: 7025 USA vs. Takisha Monique Jernagin DEFT:

: PRESENT 9 NOT PRESENT : Custody
Crt Rptr/ECR: David C. German N/A

Deputy Clerk Teddy Bengtson A.U.S. Attorney Ann B. Scheel

Interpreter Language Attorney for Defendant Roger Todd Margolis (Appointed)

9 9 : : 9 : : : 9 : 9 : :

Dft not appearing, on mot of US Atty, order bond revoked/forfeited and B/W issued JUDGMENT Defendant is placed on probation for a period of on Ct(s) [SENTENCE]

9 with supervision 9 w/o supervision

Committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a period of 57 Months on Ct(s) 2 of the Indictment. Supervised release term of 5 Years by law on Ct(s) 2 Fine of $waived on Ct(s) 2 Restitution of $312,200.00 ordered pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3596 Special Assessment of $100.00 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3013 on Ct(s) 2 On Motion of U.S. Atty: Ct(s) all remaining counts (Counts 1, 3, 4 and 5) are dismissed TOTAL FINE $waived

9 Bond exonerated upon surrender to USM Dft advised of waiver of right to appeal 9 Appeal bond set at $
Order bond exonerated Dft to surrender under Voluntary Surrender Program as directed to the designated institution by the U.S. Marshal. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations filed in this matter and accepts the defendant's plea of guilty and plea agreement. Other: Kim Phillips (family friend) addresses the Court on behalf of the defendant. Defendant's Objection to Pre-sentence report and Motion for Downward Departure (aberrant behavior) are argued to the Court. The Court rules as set forth on the record. IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Downward Departure re: aberrant behavior. The Court is satisfied that this particular act does not qualify as a single act of aberrant behavior. Defendant's oral request for downward departure for minor role of the defendant is denied. The Court is satisfied that a variance from the advisory guideline range is appropriate for the reasons stated on the record.
Time in Court 50 minutes Case 2:04-cr-01050-JAT Document 125 Filed 12/12/2005 Page 1 of 1