Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 42.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: November 22, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 275 Words, 1,645 Characters
Page Size: 610 x 779 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43229/534-9.pdf

Download Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 42.6 kB)


Preview Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 534-9 FiIed11/22/2006 Page10f3

CASE NO. CV-04-0299-PHX—DGC and
CV-O4-1023-PHX—DGC
Meadowlark Lemon, et al.
vs_ Harlem Globetrotters lnl‘l, Inc., et al.
DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT 109Ga
DATE: {DEN.
DATE: EVID.
BY:
Deputy Clerk
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 534-9 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 2 of 3

Maximum Profits by Plaintiff, Taking Into Account Causation {ljsing Sales Detail Reports}
i Meadowlark Lemon
Style # Units Sold Amount Cost of Cost of Gross Profit 30% Deduction Net Profits
{After {After Goods Goods Sold and % (Samsung; (After
Causation) Causation) Sold/Unit Overhead) Causation)
113002 1,546 $35,964.03 $12.08210 $18,678.93 $17,285.10 $10,789.21 $6,495.89
48.06%
HGB3002 422 $6,927.91 $8.60510 $3,631.35 $3,296.56 $2,078.37 $1.218.19
47.58%
H3305 91 $3,932.08 $17.61090 $1,602.59 $2,329.49 $1,179.62 $1,149.87
59.24%
H3347 1,199 $45,059.99 $12.69600 $15,222.50 $29,837.49 $13,517.99 $16,319.50
66.22%
H3351 1,112 $39,470.92 $13.43240 $14,936.83 $24,534.09 $11,841.28 $12,692.81
62.16%
H3352 1,269 $43,293.12 $11.87410 $15,068.23 $28,224.89 $12,987.94 $15,236.95
65.19%
TOTAL 5,639 $174,648.05 _ $69,140.44 $105,507.61 $52,394.41 $53,113.20
Curly Neal: None
Margues Haynes: None
Dallas Thornton: None
Twiggy Sanders: None
Gator Rivers: None
Showboat Hall: None
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC Document 534-9 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 3 013

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 534-9

Filed 11/22/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 534-9

Filed 11/22/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 534-9

Filed 11/22/2006

Page 3 of 3