Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

N I UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS, No. 05-17068
C D.C. N0. CV-04-00306-SRB
Plaintiff - Appellant, _
V.
JUDGMENT
ROBINSON, Corrections Officer; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees. _
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona l
l (Phoenix). _
p On consideration whereoi it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
I Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is DISMISSED for lack of .
jurisdiction.
Filed and entered 12/ 14/05 i I i
` A more c:<;>»=>v
CATHY A. CATTERSON
Clerk g_jaGe>ur=1· - A T, , .
ATQEST _; X _,
i'!_,·j~?;JA_{L[I 5 Zlilliif j, .
` . -lj-,,“§l?¤Ev·~·°I'°Ia¤vm
Case 2:04-cv-00306-SRB Document 34 Filed O1/17/2006 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D
FOR THE NINTI-I CIRCUIT I DEC | 4 2[]05
MT
JLYi‘5‘é¥'5?i%'§§i*§¤¤
ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS, No. 05-17068 p
Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV-04-00306-SRB
District of Arizona,
I v. p Phoenix
ROBINSON, Corrections Officer; et al., I
ORDER
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and FISHER, Circuit Judges ‘
A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over
this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable.
See Fed.pR. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981) (order
is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is I
entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack
of jurisdiction. I p
. A TRUE cow
CATHY A. ggngrgnscw
Clerk cz!-{fburt
ATTEST; .3;, `.Q..' - .
- `"``i
jj;.-‘JAN_—U 5 ms A
· '§ '· c’s1en<‘ ‘
S:\PROSE\panelords\2005\12.05\Decernber5\O5-17068.wpd I v 'J '``` ni
_
Case 2:04-cv-00306-SRB Document 34 Filed _O1/17/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00306-SRB

Document 34

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00306-SRB

Document 34

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2