Free Motion to Appoint Counsel - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

t ' __EEEE.u¤ j;éEE‘3E‘°
i FEB ,0 3 2005
4 B$"i¤i§T§ Qg,$g¤I YE"
5 --1:;—;,—________. DEPUTY
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 Gerald Byerly, ) No. CIV 04-323-PHX-CLH (GEE)
T 10 Plaintiff, g ORDER
11 vs. i
12 Deputy Warden; et al., i Z
13 Defendants. i ‘
14
I5
16 Pending before the court is a motion/letter filed by the plaintiff on December 6, 2004. I
17 [doc. # 16] The court constmes the tiling as a motion for reconsideration ofthe court’s prior
18 order denying the plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
19 1915, tiled on August 17, 2004. [doc. # 6]
I 20- The case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Edmonds for all pretriaYn·IatT5§i I I--
21 pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.2. Rules of Practice ofthe U.S. District Coun for the District j`
22 of Arizona. ` it
23 Upon further consideration and review, the court will grant the motion for
24 appointment of counsel. Accordingly, _
26 ITIS ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel filed bythe plaintiff on
27 August 17, 2004, is GRANTED. [doc. # 6]
28
C se 2:O4—cv—OO323-FJIVI Document 98-2 Filed O2/O8/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration filed by the plaintiff
2 on December 6, 2004, is GRANTED. [doc. # I6] Amanda Vaught of the firm Waterfall
3 Economidis, 5210 E. Williams Circle, Tucson, Arizona, 85711- 4473, is appointed counsel
4 for the petitioner. The Clerk is instructed to send a copy of this order to all parties and i
5 petitioner’s new counsel. Ar. an (saw)- M0 sfzf
6 E
2 2 *$
8 DATED this gx day of January, 2005. "Y"
2 Q2 Q ééggg
10 Glenda . Edmon s
H United States Magistrate Judge
12
is I
I4 i
is
ic
17 I Ei:
is
19 `
21
22
23 ‘ T.
221 "
25 .;
26 A Qi
27
· 2 ·
C se 2:O4—cv—OO323-FJIVI Document 98-2 Filed O2/O8/2006 Page 2 of 2 Z

Case 2:04-cv-00323-FJM

Document 98-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00323-FJM

Document 98-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 2 of 2