Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

Meritage Homes Corporation, ct al.
V.
Rick Hancock Homes, ct al.
CV—04-0384-PHX-ROS
EXHIBIT TO:
MERITAGE’S OPPOSITION TO GREG HANCOCK’S (1) MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REQUEST FOR A RULE 54(B) PARTIAL
JUDGMENT AND (2) HIS REQUEST FOR RULE 54(B) PARTIAL
JUDGMENT
Exhibit Descri » tion
1 Jud; ent of Dismissal
1890548.1
Case 2:O4—cv—OO384-ROS Document 356-2 Filed O9/21/2006 Page 1 of 3

S E C E I \/ 5; D
APR 1 I 2006
E ) SNELL $2; lbi/ILMER
1 FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
Kenneth J. Sherk (No. 001371)
2 Timothy J. Burke (No. 002568)
3003 North Central Avenue _
3 Suite 2600 ·
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2913
4 Telephone: (602) 916-5000
Email: ksherk fclaw.com
5 tburke fclaw.com
6 Attomeys for Defendant
Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P., an Arizona professional
7 corporation,
8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
10 MARICOPA COUNTY
11
Gregory Hancock, an individual,
12 No. CV 2004-017311
Plaintiff]
13 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
v.
14 (Assigned to the Honorable Robert C. Houser)
MERITAGE CORPORATION, a
15 Maryland corporation; STEVEN J.
HILTON, an individual; JOHN R.
16 LANDON, an individual; LARRY W.
SEAY, an individual; and SNELL &
17 WILMQER, L.L.P., an Arizona
. professional corporation,
18
Defendants.
19
2() Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and oral arguments and
2] briefings related thereto; the fact that the allegations and Motion to Dismiss have been
22 pending for longer than a year; the fact that Plaintiff requested and this Court permitted
23 and the Plaintiff filed supplemental briefing October 24, 2005; the Court’s earlier Minute
24 Entry Ruling of November 4, 2005; the form of Judgment of Dismissal lodged by
25 Defendants November 7, 2005; Plaintiff" s Objection to Form of Order and Request for
26 Reconsideration and related briefings and oral arguments thereon, and good cause
Fiawwsmons Camo,
PNUFESSIUNELQJHRPKIRATIDN
I I Case 2:O4—cv—OO384-ROS Document 356-2 Filed O9/21/2006 Page 2 of 3 '

1
1 appearing:
. 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Gregory Hancock’s claims for Abuse of
3 Process and Malicious Prosecution are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.
4 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff Gregory Hancock shall pay
5 taxable costs to Defendants upon timely submissions of statements of costs by
6 Defendants.
7
8 DATED this Lfxday of , 2006.
9
10 HON. ROBERT C. HOUSER
11 1—1oNoRABLE Ronnnr c. Housen,
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR
12 coukr JUDGE
13
14 1756338
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
.».., .... .U1. _ 2 _
Case 2:O4—cv—OO384-ROS Document 356-2 Filed O9/21/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 356-2

Filed 09/21/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 356-2

Filed 09/21/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 356-2

Filed 09/21/2006

Page 3 of 3