Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Hypercom Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Omron Corporation, Defendant.

No. CV 04-0400 PHX PGR

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of Counsel's Motion of Ray K. Harris to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (Doc. 211); however, counsel has still failed to adhere to the Local Rules of Civil Procedure in submitting such a motion. Specifically, Counsel has failed to submit a proposed form of order as required by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b)(2) and (3) as well as 7.1(c). rules, In civil cases when a party requests specific relief, except for dismissal or summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b) or 56, the party must lodge with the Clerk a separate proposed order. (3) Proposed orders prepared for the signature of a United States District Judge or a Magistrate Judge must be prepared on a separate document containing the As required by the aforementioned

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 215

Filed 05/09/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

heading data required by subparagraphs (a)(2) and (3) above as appropriate, and must not be included as an integral part of stipulations, motions, or other pleadings. The proposed order must not contain any information identifying the party submitting the order. Proposed orders submitted electronically must not contain a date or signature block. Accordingly, the Court will not grant the motion until it receives the required proposed form of order in compliance with the Local Rules of Court. At this time, the proposed form of order should be emailed to Chambers at

[email protected]. DATED this 9th day of May, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 215

Filed 05/09/2007

Page 2 of 2