Free Stipulation - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

David P. Irmscher (Indiana State Bar No. 15026-02) John K. Henning (Indiana State Bar No. 25203-49) Baker & Daniels LLP 111 East Wayne Street, Suite 800 Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Telephone: 260-424-8000 Facsimile: 260-460-1700 Ray Harris (Arizona State Bar No. 007408) Paul Moore (Arizona State Bar No. 019912) Fennemore Craig 3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 2600 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2913 Telephone: 602-916-5000 Facsimile: 602-916-5999 Attorneys for the defendant, Omron Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Hypercom Corporation, CAUSE NO. CV04-0400 PHX PGR STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR OMRON CORPORATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO HYPERCOM CORPORATION' MOTION FOR S LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

12

Plaintiff,
13

vs.
14

Omron Corporation,
15

Defendant
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
P HOENIX

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.3, Defendant Omron Corporation ("Omron") and the plaintiff, Hypercom Corporation ("Hypercom"), have stipulated that Omron shall have an additional seven days ­ to and including January 12, 2006 ­ to file a response to Hypercom' Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Complaint ("Motion For s Leave"). This stipulation is made for good cause. Hypercom filed its Motion For Leave on December 15, 2005. After reviewing the Motion For Leave and researching its merits, Omron has decided to file a response opposing the Motion For Leave on the basis of futility. Omron' response currently is due January 5, 2006. However, Omron requires s additional time to prepare its response because of the impending New Year' Day holiday s
PHX/RHARRIS/1747661.1/12623.001

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 87

Filed 12/30/2005

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
P HOENIX

weekend and, furthermore, counsel for Omron is working on its reply brief in support of its Motion For Summary Judgment. Omron respectfully requests that the Court approve the stipulation and grant an extension of time to and including January 12, 2006, for Omron to file its response to the Motion For Leave. Counsel for Hypercom has reviewed this stipulation and given counsel for Omron permission to sign the stipulation on Hypercom' behalf. s Respectfully submitted on December 29, 2005,

s/Ray K. Harris David P. Irmscher John K. Henning BAKER & DANIELS LLP 111 East Wayne Street Suite 800 Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Ray Harris Paul Moore FENNEMORE CRAIG 3003 North Central Avenue Suite 2600 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2913 Attorneys for Defendant Omron Corporation

s/Ray K. Harris (with permission) Michael Kelly Sid Leach SNELL & WILMER LLP One Arizona Center 400 East Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 Attorneys for Plaintiff Hypercom Corporation

PHX/RHARRIS/1747661.1/12623.001

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 87 2 Filed 12/30/2005

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
P HOENIX

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 29, 2005, I electronically transmitted the attached documents to the Clerk' Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and s transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Sid Leach Michael K. Kelly SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. One Arizona Center 400 East Van Buren Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 I hereby certify that on December 29, 2005, I served the attached document by mail on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF System: Peter Henry Schelstraete SCHELSTRAETE LAW OFFICE 1949 East Broadway Suite 107 Tempe, AZ 85282-0001 Christopher S. Walton, Esq. Gregory S. Donahue, Esq. SIMON, GALASSO & FRANTZ, PLC 115 Wild Basin Road Suite 107 Austin, TX 78703

PHX/RHARRIS/1747661.1/12623.001

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 87 3 Filed 12/30/2005

Page 3 of 3