Free Jury Verdict - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

m- GOPY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ·—" RECENED H"
AUG - 6 ZUU?
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CLERK U S QISTHIGT mum
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
DEPUTY
Alexander Jung, )
)
Plaintiff, )
) VERDICT
vs. )
)
) CV 04-429-PHX-MHM
)
John Potter, Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service )
I
Defendant. )

SPECIAL INTERROGATORY FORM
l. Has the Plaintiff proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Plaintiff’ s
disability was the sole reason for the Defendant’s decision to change Plaintiffs work
hours with no guarantee of hours and send Plaintiff home, or to require Plaintiff to use
I leave on unspecified dates?
l 3 {
Yes No
I lf the answer to Question No. l is “no," proceed to Question No. 2. If the answer to
Question No. l is "yes," do not answer any further questions.
2. Has the Plaintiff proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Plaintiffs
disability was a motivating factor for the Def`endant’s decision to change Plaintiffs
work hours with no guarantee of hours and send Plaintiff home, or to require Plaintiff
to use leave on unspecified dates?
Yes No
Case 2:04-cv—00429-I\/IHI\/I Document 181 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 2

If the answer to Question N0. 2 is “yes," proceed to Question No. 3. If the answer to
Question No. 2 is "no," do not answer any further questions.
3. Has the Defendant proved, by a preponderance ofthe evidence, that the Defendant’s
decision to change Plaintiffs work hours with no guarantee of hours and send
Plaintiff home or to require Plaintiff to use leave on unspecified dates was also
motivated by a lawful reason'?
Yes No
If your answer to Question No. 3 is "yes," proceed to Question No. 4. If your answer to
Question NO. 3 is "no," do not answer any further questions.
4. Has the Defendant proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Defendant
would have made the same decision to change Plaintiffs work hours with no
guarantee of hours and send Plaintiff home or to require Plaintiff to use leave on
unspecified dates even if the Plaintiffs disability had played no role in the
Defendant’s decision to change Plaintiffs work hours with no guarantee of hours and
send Plaintiff home cr to require Plaintiff to use leave on unspecified dates?
Yes No
i . M
Dated this 6 day of August, 2007.
(Presiding Juror)
Case 2:04-cv—00429-I\/IHI\/I Document 181 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00429-MHM

Document 181

Filed 08/06/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00429-MHM

Document 181

Filed 08/06/2007

Page 2 of 2