Free Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dora Schrio, et al., 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Clerk of Court has advised the Court that this document has not been treated as a Notice of Appeal. Should P laint iff wish to appeal, he must file a separate Notice of Appeal. Document 67 Filed 04/05/2006 Page 1 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Faron Earl Tisher, Sr., Plaintiff, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CV 04-434-PHX-EHC ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's M otion for Reconsideration and/or Notice of Appeal.1 [Dkt. 66]. Plaintiff s eeks reconsideration of this Court's Order [dkt. 64] dismissing his Complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Plaintiff does not offer new evidence or demonstrate clear error in his M otion for Reconsideration. See 389 Orange Street Partners v. Arnold, 179 F .3d 656, 665 (9th Cir. 1999) (reconsideration should not be granted absent new evidence, clear error, or a change in the law). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's M otion for Reconsideration and/or Notice of Appeal [dkt. 64] is DENIED.

Case 2:04-cv-00434-EHC-ECV

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DATED this 4th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-00434-EHC-ECV

-2Document 67 Filed 04/05/2006

Page 2 of 2