Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALBERT W. DELEON, No. 05-l7l59
D.C. N0. CV-04-00446—PGR
Plaintiff — Appellant,
JUDGMENT
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, Director,
sued in her individual & official capacity;
et al.,
Defendants - Appellees. .
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix).
On consideration whereof] it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
3 Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.
Filed and entered Wednesday, December 14, 2005
A Tw?
carey, e¤;<2a‘r’tEF%S®N- T,
Clerk ef_·C.‘ourt
Arrest _ -._—— L
.. A ` _ I- `I
_ _ ev ' .
¤¤= .- ~ "
Case 2:04-cv-00446-JAT Document 195 Filed O1/17/2006 Page 1 of 2

L; , ., P ~ _ _ 1 [ xf
l UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D
Fon THE N1NTH CIRCUIT DEC 1 I 2005
CATHY
g ¤.S.é*¤El¥§?i%'$t§f§*‘“
ALBERT W. DELEON, No. 05-17159 _ _
. Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV-04-00446-PGR l
District of Arizona, _‘
v. Phoenix
I DORA B. SCI-[RIRO, Director, Director,
sued in her individual & official capacity; ORDER
et al., »
Defendants - Appellees. I p
Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and FISHER, Circuit Judges
A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over
this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is
not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties). Consequently, this
I appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
S:\PROSE\panelords\2005\l2.05\December5\05-17159.wpd
Case 2:04-cv-00446-JAT Document 195 Filed O1/17/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00446-JAT

Document 195

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00446-JAT

Document 195

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2