Free Reply - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

O O
Exh1b1t 1
Case 2:04—cv—00544—PGR Document 104-2 Filed 05/26/2006 Page1 0f3

l
2
3
I 4
5
6
7
g UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
10
Richard G. Krauth. an individual, and R.M. No. CV O4-0544 PHX PGR
l l Wade & Co,. an Oregon corporation,
12 P|¤i¤tiffS» ipnoposrzm onnnn
13
vs.
14 I »
Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York
15 corporation,
16 Defendants.
l7
8 Phelps Dodge Corporation. a New York
I 1 corporation,
19 . . .
Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
20
21 vs.
22 Richard G. Krauth, an individual, and R.M.
Wade & Co., an Oregon corporation,
23
24 Counterclaim Defendants.
25
26 A A
27
28
Case 2:04—cv—00544—PGR Document 104-2 Filed 05/26/2006 Page 2 of 3

I After consideration ofthe Defendants’ May 26, 2006 Motion to File Surreply and
2 Surreply to Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment,
3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Defendants may tile the Surreply to
4 Plaintiffs Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and that such tiling is
5 deemed to have occurred on May 26, 2006, with the tiling of DeI`endants’ Motion.
6 Dated: May _, 2006.
7
8
9
I0
11
I2
I3
I4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 I
24
25
26
27
28
Case 2:04—cv—00544—PGR Document 104-27 - Filed 05/26/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00544-PGR

Document 104-2

Filed 05/26/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00544-PGR

Document 104-2

Filed 05/26/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00544-PGR

Document 104-2

Filed 05/26/2006

Page 3 of 3