Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA [CIVIL ORDER - MINUTE ENTRY] Case No. Title: CV 04-00558-PHX-EHC(CRP) KARIN JEAN SMITH V. LINDA VEGA Date: August 30, 2006

HONORABLE CHARLES R. PYLE

PROCEEDINGS:

~ Open Court

~ Chambers

Other

NOTICE -WARNING Defendant Linda Vega filed a motion for summary judgment on August 28, 2006. Plaintiff is advised of the following specific provisions of Rule 7.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona: Subparagraph (e) provides: Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion including its supporting memorandum, and the response including its supporting memorandum, each shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages, exclusive of attachments and any required statement of facts. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply including its supporting memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages, exclusive of attachments. Subparagraph (i) provides: If a motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements of this Rule, or if the opposing party does not serve and file the required answering memoranda, or if counsel for any party fails to appear at the time and place assigned for oral argument, such non-compliance may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily.
Case 2:04-cv-00558-EHC Document 49 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 2

IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall have until MONDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2006 by which to file a Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. It is plaintiff's obligation to timely respond to all motions. The failure of plaintiff to respond to defendants' Motion to Dismiss may in the discretion of the Court be deemed a consent to the granting of that Motion without further notice, and judgment may be entered dismissing the complaint and action with prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(i). See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

Case 2:04-cv-00558-EHC

Document 49

Filed 08/31/2006

Page 2 of 2