1 II TERRY GODDARD
ATTORNEY GENERAL
2 (FIRM STATE BARNo. 14000) 3 AARON J. MOSKOWITZ
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL CRIMINAL ApPEALS SECTION 1275 W. WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007-2997
4 5
II
II
TELEPHONE: (602) 542-4686
(STATE BAR NUMBER 022246)
6
RESPONDENTS
II
ATTORNEYS
FOR
7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
WILLIAM FLOYD SMITH,
Petitioner,
-VS
CIV 04-573-PHX-FJM (MS)
DORA B. SCHRIRO, et aI., Respondents.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
EXHIBIT J, PART 5, PGS. 160-166 FOR ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM Document 33-17 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 8
160 1
penalty when administered to a minor, and I would hope that the legislature didn't pass two, two criminal statutes that apply to the same act. I'd like you to
2 3
4
5 6
try to shed some light on that if you would. MR. GRIFFITH:
I'm going to -- ,I'm going
to be shedding light on that in my Rule 20 Motion tomorrow at the close of the state's case.
THE COURT:
7
8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Well, for the purpose of
allowing me to do some research on it, why don't you
shed light on it now, Mr. Griffith. MR. GRIFFITH: Honor.
,
Okay.
Thank you, Your
Your Honor, our argument essentially is going to be this: 13-3407 talks about administration
and administer as defined in 3407 -- it's defined in 3401, and it means: To facilitate the inhalation or
17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25
ingestion of a substance.
Facilitate means, to help
someone else meet their goal, which implies that someone else wants to ingest the substance or the drug. So
essentially the Legislature has not said two separate things, has not covered the same crime with two separate
statutes.
You can see then in 1205, it clearly states that this is introduction without -- and it uses the word, introduced into the body of another person
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM
Document 33-17
Filed 08/11/2005
Page 2 of 8
161 1
without such other person's consent.
And the
2 3
distinction between 1205 and 3407 is that facilitate
assumes consent on the part of the person you're facilitating and introduction under 1205 says specifically that you do not have their consent. So it
4
5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
is our position, that he is charged under the wrong Statute, that he has not facilitated; that if he is guilty of anything, he has introduced without the
consent.
And to this point we have heard no evidence
whatsoever that Ms. Tseko consented or wanted Mr. smith to facilitate the introduction of drugs into her body.
THE COURT:
You're saying that ARS
I
~ection -- I'll be glad to hear from you in,a minute. MS. Bowen, ,when~ver you're ready.
You're saying, M~. Griffith, the charge contained in the indictment, 13-3407, refers to administration of a dangerous drug with the recipient's consent? MR. GRIFFITH:
THE COURT:
Yes.
You're also saying 13-1205,
which is the requested instruction that you have asked I give to the Jury, refers to the unlawful administration of a dangerous drug without a person's consent? MR. GRIFFITH:
THE COURT:
Yes.
You're saying that at this
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM
Document 33-17
Filed 08/11/2005
Page 3 of 8
162 1 2 3
point in time the testimony and the evidence is such that there is no evidence that the drug was administered with Rachel's consent. MR. GRIFFITH:
THE COURT:
4 5
6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13
Yes.
And that therefore, based on
that, 13-3407 would not apply? MR. GRIFFITH:
THE COURT:
Yes.
Thank you.
MS. BOWEN:
Your Honor, in response to
your first inquiry, I donit have, I don't believe, a copy of the Defendant's instructions, or if I have, I haven't looked at them, you know, realizing this issue was going to come up at this point in time to be aware this was an issue. I just ask for some time. Maybe we
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
could address this tomorrow. response.
THE COURT:
I don't reaLly have a
You certainly have that right.
I didn't want to prolong our jury instruction session, and that's why I, when I discovered this earlier today I wanted to bring it to your attention. Take a look at
Mr. Griffith's requested jury instructions, Ms. Bowen,
and MS. BOWEN:
It's a one-page, aSking for
facilitation, that's it? MR. GRIFFITH: It's just two pages, yes,
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM
Document 33-17
Filed 08/11/2005
Page 4 of 8
163
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
sir, and I did give this to her before. of papers floating around.
THE COURT:
There is a lot
-It's the two pages, first page
containing the elements of 13-1205, and I believe from RAJI 12.05. MS. BOWEN:
THE COURT:
I do have it.
And the second page contains a Is that from the statute or
definition of facilitating.
is -- where is that taken from, Mr. Griffith? MR. GRIFFITH: I could not find the
statutory definition of facilitate. MS. BOWEN: Offenses.
THE COURT: MS. BOWEN:
It's in the Preparatory
Is it?
1003 or something like that. So there is a definition,
MR. GRIFFITH: but MS. BOWEN:
THE COURT:
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
1004.
Is that the same facilitation
that is referred to in Well, the word facilitate is derived from definition of administer.
Counsel. That's 3401 I believe,
MR. GRIFFITH:
THE COURT:
Yes, Your Honor, it is.
You're offering what, a
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM
Document 33-17
Filed 08/11/2005
Page 5 of 8
164 1
dictionary definition of the verb, of the term
facilitate?
2 3
MR. GRIFFITH: definition of 13-1004 for it. my argument.
I'm now going to offer the That fits perfectly with
4
5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
THE COURT: .All right.
Counsel:
Food for thought,
I'm not sure 13-1004 refers to the same
facilitation as facilitation that's included in the
definition of administer. My initial reaction is that
the facilitation defined in 13-io04 refers to a specific offense which is facilitation, either a class 5 or class
6 felony or class 1 or class 3 misdemeanor, depending on
certain circumstances.
And I may be wrong.
But give
me, please, your arguments on whether the facilitation
definition in 13-1004 applies to the term facilitate in
the definition of administer under 13-3401. Also, Ms. Bowen, you certainly can have until tomorrow to give me your argument on whether the offense, based on the evidence presented, falls under
13-1205, the class 5 felony for administering a
dangerous drug to a minor or whether it properly falls under the offense as indicted, 13-3407. Thank you.
I will need to meet with you then at 1:00 o'clock to try to ferret that out and I'll see you at
1:00.
We will have the Jury start with us at 1:30.
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM
Document 33-17
Filed 08/11/2005
Page 6 of 8
165 1
Thank you very much.
2
*****
3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM
Document 33-17
Filed 08/11/2005
Page 7 of 8
.
I
,
do
'y certify that the foregoing pages constitute a full, :ate
)
typewritten record of my stenographic notes
1 at said time and place. all done to the best of my
,
,
and ability. DATED this
day of
,19
)
\
°
bfficial Court Reporter
Case 2:04-cv-00573-FJM
Document 33-17
Filed 08/11/2005
Page 8 of 8