Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I Kendall D. Steele, Esq. (#012367)
2 John E. Drazkowski, Esq. (#018319)
JARDINE, BAKER, HICKMAN & HOUSTON, P.L.L.C
3 3300 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2600
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
4 PH: (602) 776-3024
5
Attomeys for Pestube Systems, Inc.
6
7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 HomeTeam Pest Defense, LLC, No. CV04 0608 PHX JAT
10
11 Plaintiff, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
12 vs. SEPARATE MOTION FOR
13 SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pestube Systems, Inc.
14
Defendants
15
16
17 Defendant Pestube Systems, Inc. respectfully requests leave to file a separate Motion for
18 Summary Judgment regarding Count Four of Plaintiffs Complaint, Intentional Interference
19 With Contract.
20
This Court's original Rule 16 Scheduling Order stated that only one summary judgment
21
22 motion would be permitted per side. Defendant subsequently tiled Motion for Leave to File
23 Multiple Motions. This Court denied that Motion without prejudice.
24
25
26
Case 2:04-cv-00608-JAT Document 82 Filed 10/19/2005 Page 1 of 3

1 Defendant Pestube now moves for leave file to a separate and specific motion for
2 . . . .... . .
summary judgment with respect to Plaintiffs intentional interference with contract claim for
3
4 the following reasons.
5 First, Defendant Pestube is being defended under a reservation of rights. Upon
6 infomation and belief] Count Four is most likely not a covered claim. Therefore, it is
7
necess and rudent for Pestube to first seek summary 'ud ent relief as to Count Four
8 my P J gm
9 before seeking such relief as to the remaining counts.
10 Second, Defendant Pestube believes that while a separate motion for summary judgment
ll
is re uired as to Count Four, onl one additional motion for summary `ud ent will be
12 Q Y J gm
13 required as to the remaining counts.
14 Third, Pestube submits that the issues and factual allegations pertinent to Count Four
15 while related to the remaining trademark infringement counts, raise specific unrelated state tort
16
I7 issues.
18 Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, Defendant Pestube respectfully requests
19 leave of Court to file a separate motion for summary judgment regarding Count Four,
20
21 intentional interference with contract.
22
23
24
25
26
Case 2:04-cv-00608-JAT Document 822 Filed 10/19/2005 Page 2 of 3

1 Respectfully submitted this 19th day of October, 2005.
2 JARDINE, BAKER, IHCKMAN & HOUSTON, P.L.L.C
3
4
5
By s/Kendall D. Steele
6 Kendall D. Steele
7 John E. Drazkowski
3300 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2600
8 Phoenix, Arizona 85012
9 Attomeys for Defendant
*0 CERTIFICATE or SERVICE
ll
I hereby certify that on October 19, 2005, I electronically transmitted the attached
12 document to the Clcrk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice
13 of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants. In addition to a copy of this
document was hand-delivered to:
14
15 Charles F. Hauff, Jr. (#014465)
16 Andrew F. Halaby (#017251)
17 Melissa M. Krueger (#021176)
SNELL & WILMER, LLP.
18 One Arizona Center
400 E. Van Buren
19 Phoenix, Arizona 85004
20 Attomeys for Plaintiff
21
22 s/Kendall D. Steele
23
24
25
26
Case 2:04-cv-00608-JAT Document 82 3 Filed 10/19/2005 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00608-JAT

Document 82

Filed 10/19/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00608-JAT

Document 82

Filed 10/19/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00608-JAT

Document 82

Filed 10/19/2005

Page 3 of 3