Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 348.1 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 764 Words, 4,735 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43520/84.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona ( 348.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona
I `FENNEMORE CRAIG
A Professional Corporation
2 William L. Thorpe (No. 005641)
Sal J. Rivera (No. 016728)
3 Melissa W. Rawlinson (No. 021285)
3003 North Central Avenue
4 Suite 2600
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-29lB
5 Telephone: (602) 9l6—5000
6 Attorneys for BNSF
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
10 STEVE SCHRUM, No. CIV04-6l9—PHX-RCB
I l Plaintiff, JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
lr) DISCOVERY CUTOFF
- v.
13 THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN
SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a
14 corporation,
I5 Defendant.
I6
THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN
I? SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. a
corporation,
18
19 Third-Party Plaintiff;
v.
20
CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY OF
21 ARIZONA., a corporation, ABC
Corporations I-IV, fictitious
22 corporations.
23 Third-Party Defendant.
24
Q5 Plaintiff Steve Schrum, defendant BNSF Railway Company (‘°BNSF") and third—
26 party defendant Chemical Lime Company ("Chemical Lime") hereby jointly move to
rfasesintoau {mic, rt: I?3644¢t,|
Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB Document 84 Filed O3/O1/2006 Page 1 of4

1 extend the deadline for the completion of discovery from March I, 2006 to 45 days after
2 the Court rules on pending motions for summary judgment. The parties have exchanged
3 numerous disclosure statements and served and responded to written discovery. The
4 parties have also completed a number of depositions. As the Court knows, however,
5 BNSF and Chemical Lime have tiled motions for summary judgment. The parties would
6 like to postpone any final discovery that might be necessazy until after the Coun rules on
T the pending motions. The parties agree that doing so will preserve resources and will not
8 unduly delay the resolution of this case. A trial date has not been set and the next status
9 conference is scheduled for April 17, 2006. The parties therefore request a short
I0 extension to complete discovery until after the Court rules on pending motions.I
ll A proposed form of Order is provided for the Court’s convenience.
12 DATED this 1** day of March, 2006.
13 reixniieiuosus camo, itc.
14
I5 By s/Sal J. Rivera
William L. Thorpe
I6 Sal J. Rivera
Melissa W. Rawlinson _
U Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party
18 Plaintiff BNSF
lg HOEY &1’ARJNA, P.C.
20
9] By sfSal J. Rivera
‘ George T. Brugess
72 542 S. Dearborn, Suite 200
r Chicago, Illinois 60605
(312) 939--1212
2.3
24 I The parties have previously requested and received three brief discovery extensions. On January 25, 2005, the
9 Court ordered that the deadline for the taking ofplaintitfs expert deposition be extended from February I I, 2005 to
··5 February 18, 2005. Dri March 7, 2005, the Court extended the deadline for the dlsciosure of BN SF‘s expert
witnesses from March 4, 2005 to March 22, 2005. On December I, 2005 the Court extended the discovery deadline
26 from December I, 2005 to March 1, 2006.
I’LNNlib-IURE (`R.—·il¤, P ti lj¤'354»14_|
|‘ilus>ls - 2 -
Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB Document 84 Filed O3/O1/2006 Page 2 of 4

1
9 SCHNEIDER & ONOFRY P.C.
3
By__s/Sal J. Rivera
4 Charles D-. On0f1y
_ 3101 N. Central Ave., Suite 600
D Phoenix, Arizona 85012
(602) 230-8985
6 Attorney for Third-Party Defendant
7 Chemical Lime
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1·`ENNEI\-MRE CRAIG, P F 1736444.1
Plllll-'V1X - 3 -
Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB Document 84 Filed O3/O1/2006 Page 3 of 4

l CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2 El l hereby certify that on March 1, 2006, I electronically transmitted the
attached document to the Clerl<’s Office using the CM/ECP System for
3 filing and transmittal of a Notice ofElectron;ic Filing to the following
CM/ECF registrants:
4
Charles D. Onofry
5 ReN ae A. Nachman
Schneider & Onofry, P.C.
6 3101 N. Central Ave., Ste. 600
Phoenix, AZ 85012
7 Attomeys for Third-Party
8 Defendant Chemical Lime
George T. Brugess
9 Hoey & Farina, P.C.
542 S. Dearborn, Suite 200
I0 Chicago, II. 60605
1 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff
12 Q I hereby certify that on March 1, 2006, I served the attached document by
facsimile and U.S. mail on the following, who are not registered
13 participants of the CM/ECF System:
14
I5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Fe~¤·n;r.iou|· C's<.»ur.;_ P C 17364.-|4_|
PIHII-\|.\ I, 4 “
Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB Document 84 Filed O3/O1/2006 Page 4 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB

Document 84

Filed 03/01/2006

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB

Document 84

Filed 03/01/2006

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB

Document 84

Filed 03/01/2006

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB

Document 84

Filed 03/01/2006

Page 4 of 4