Free Reply in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

-»»sv,)° I _
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
U—Haul International, Inc.; U—Haul ) _
Company of Pennsylvania; U—Haul Company ) .
Of Florida; and Republic Western )
Insurance Company, )
Plaintiffs, )
i vs. · l )Case No:
_ )CIV—O4—O662—PHX—DGC
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, )
I A ‘ Defendants. )
. A LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, )
)
Defendant/Counter—Plaintiff, )
v. ‘ )
_ ' . )
REPUBLIC_WESTERN INSURANCE CO.; U—HAUL )
INTERNATIONAL, INC.; U—HAUL COMPANY OF )
PENNSYLVANIA; U—HAUL COMPANY OF FLORIDA;)
AMERCO; AMERCO REAL ESTATE CO. D/B/A )
NOVI MANUFACTURING CO. AND WARRINGTON )
y,- MANUFACTURING CO.; AMERCO REAL ESTATE )
Q We SERVICES, INC.; AMERCO REAL ESTATE )
€fr@ COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC.; U—HAUL BUSINESS )
if Y ` CONSULTANTS, INC.; U—HAUL COMPANY OF ) p
““ ARIZONA; U—HAUL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA )
‘ D/B/A PARAMOUNT MANUFACTURING CO.; )
U—HAUL CO. OF INDIANA, INC. D/B/A )
CHICAGO ASSEMBLY DIVISION; U—HAUL CO. OF)
MASSACHUSETTS, INC. D/B/A BOSTON TRAILER)
MANUFACTURING COMPANY; INC.; U—HAUL CO. )
OF MICHIGAN; AND U—HAUL CO. OF TEXAS )
· D/B/A DFW MFG. co., iuc.;‘ )
- )
_‘ _ I Counter—Defendants. )
DEPOSITION OF MICHAEL JACOB MIZRACHI
January 12; 2005 EEER I
Phoenix, Arizona ,mWmfi@§’ijw (_E;,
E A I 9 = 0 4 a · m-
‘ PI epa]: Gd by :
RRR nr c2—xsTR0, RRR-, GCR
CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER iimeik y.·. Egwy éfeigiwye
a . y Prepared rer; 4 I Qt
Q; g, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ r§§§
jr,. _... i (ORIGINAL) gill;]. fllogéi Central Avenue
· . Phoenix, Arizona 85012
` . EXHIBIT T 6022642230
§ eee.62e.9090
. :2; [0 F 6022642245
Case 2:04-ev—OO662-DGC Document 3 8 OO6 PagegHffoifa®r¤as.c¤m

83
1 Q. Going back a moment to Exhibit 84. Strike that
2 question. Withdraw that question.
y 3 Looking at 85, which is Aon Bates number 0488
4 through 0506. This was produced by Aon.
5 Do you know why this would be in Aon's file?
6 Well, just for the record, let me say, it says
7 Republic Western policy RX99 for 4/1/99 to 4/1/00.
8 A. Presumably for the same reasons.
9 Q. Which was to ... V
10 A. Provide information of underlying coverage.
11- Q. Okay. Provide information to who; Aon?
12 A. No. Probably for excess insurers.
13 Correct that. Yes, for Aon, as well as excess
614 insurers. h ·_
‘ I 15 Q. For the renewal years beginning 4/1 —— or
16 April 1 —— I‘m sorry.
U - 17 For the renewal periods beginning April 1, 1999,
18 and April 1, 2000, do you have any records of any copies of
3 19 Republic Western policies being sent to excess insurers
i20 other than the RU99 policy?
21 A. Do I have any records? `
22 Q. Yes. U
23 A. I do not know.
24 Q. Or any memory of that?. l
25 A. Not specifically, no. A
GRIFFIN & ASSOCIATES
Case 2:04-cv-00662-DGC Document 136-8 Filed O9/O8/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00662-DGC

Document 136-8

Filed 09/08/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00662-DGC

Document 136-8

Filed 09/08/2006

Page 2 of 2