Free Motion to Strike - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 64.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 393 Words, 2,483 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43633/129.pdf

Download Motion to Strike - District Court of Arizona ( 64.3 kB)


Preview Motion to Strike - District Court of Arizona
1 ANDREW P. THOMAS .
MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY
2
By: MARIA R. BRANDON , :
3 State Bar No. 004249
REBECCA C. SALISBURY
4 State Bar No. 022006
Deputy County Attorneys
5 MCAO Firm No. 00032000
16 DIVISION OF COUNTY COUNSEL I
Security Center Building
7 222 North Central Avenue, Suite 1100
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2206
8 Telephone (602) 506-8541
. 9 Attorneys for Sheriff Arpaio, and
Officer Montoya #A8052
10
11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
13 Randy Trimble, NO. CV 04-0745-PHX-PGR (DKD)
14 Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
STRIKE
15 v.
16 Phoenix Police, etal.,
17 Defendants.
18
19 Defendants Sheriff Arpaio and Officer Montoya #A8052 through
20 undersigned counsel, move to strike pIaintiff’s pleading entitled, "Required
21 Disclosure." The Federal Rules do not provide for such a pleading and
22 therefore, this pleading should be striken.
1
Cas 2:04-cv-00745—PGR—DKD Document 129 Filed 08/29/2005 Page 1 of 2

1 Plaintiff asks for a "photo line up." The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
2 do not provide for a photo line up as a discovery tool in a civil action. In due
3 course, plaintiff will be provided a copy of his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office
4 tile, Correctional Health Services medical chart, inmate request forms and any
5 pertinent logs, forms, incident reports, etc. Plaintiff may access the names of
6 individuals from these records or he may tile interrogatories in accordance with
7 the Federal Rules. Plaintiff has not made a showing of any need to support his
8 Request for such extraordinary discovery procedures and therefore this Request
9 should be denied.
10 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this QQ day of August 2005.
11 ANDREW P. THOMAS
MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY
12
13
MARIA R. BRANDON
14 Deputy County Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants Sheriff
15 Arpaio and OfHcer Montoya #A8052
16 ORIGINAL of the foregoing MAILED
this (gil"` day of August 2005 to:
17 V
Randy Trimble #191671
18 ASPC-Lewis-Morey Unit
PO Box 3300
19 Buckeye, AZ 85326
Plaintiff pro se
20
21
c.•o4-1os
22 S:\COUNSEL\civil\Matters\CJ\2004\Trimble v. Phoenix Police CJ04-103\Pleadings\Discovery\Response to RFA.doc
2
Cas 2:04-cv-00745—PGR—DKD Document 129 Filed 08/29/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00745-PGR-DKD

Document 129

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00745-PGR-DKD

Document 129

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 2 of 2