Free Affidavit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 49.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 6, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 423 Words, 2,709 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43671/90.pdf

Download Affidavit - District Court of Arizona ( 49.3 kB)


Preview Affidavit - District Court of Arizona
1 T. Michael Daggett (#002784)
Christian C.M. Beams (#019672)
2 STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP
3 1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584
4 (602) 279-1600
Fax: (602) 240-6925
v 5 E-mail: mdaggett@stinsonmoheckcom
( 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Alanco Technologies, Inc.
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 x ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) No. CV-04—0789—PHX-DGC
10 im A’iZ°”*’ "‘”P°"&“°“? ) SUPPLEMENTAL Arrm vrr or
TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS ) T MICHAEI DAGGETT A
ll INTERNATIONAL, INC., £»’l ACQUISITION CORPORATION, an )
12 Arizona corporation; ROBERT R. )
13 KAUFFMAN and ELIZABETH )
KAUFFMAN`, husband and wife; )
14 GREG E. OESTER and LINDA )
OESTER, husband and wife, )
I 5 Plaintiff(s), ;
16 X v. 5
17 _ CAROLINA CASUALTY l
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida ) I
18 corporation )
19 1 Defendant(s). g
29 . Michael Daggett, upon his oath, states the following: _ K
2l ` 1. 1 am over the age of 18 years. This affidavit is intended to supplement my
22 ‘
January 13, 2006 affidavit, and 1 am fully competent to testify as to the matters set forth
in both documents.
24
25
26* _ A
DB02¤'77626l 0004/70273l8.i `
i ase 2:04-cv-00789-DGC Document 90 Filed O2/06/2006 Page1 of 2

l 2. Alanco had no involvement in the TSIN Bankruptcy proceedings initially.
2 However, as the 'proceedings moved forward, it became clear to me that they presented
3 an avenue with which Alanco could garner significant concessions in the underlying
4 . .
litigation. This was the predominant reason for our involvement in these proceedings.
5 - .
6 3. The determination of the control issue in the Nevada litigation would have
7 a controlling effect on the resolution of the underlying case. This was the predominant `
8 reason forour involvement in that matter.
9 4. The underlying case involved extensive discovery, including hundreds of
10 pages of deposition testimony, and numerous dispositive motions were timely filed.
11 FURTHER AF F [ANT SAYETH NAUGHT. I .
12 4/
13 =”/
14 T. ichael` I- I I W _
15 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this U; day of February, 2006,
16 byr
17 /” 1/ t
jr 4 rr ‘ { E/} c
*8 , N y ri.?`$EE
19 . . .
My commission expires: . .
20
gi MY L WG
l0¥llY|'|.l.IG·AI\£
i mnicumccwm I
22 iw Comm Expires June30. I
23 E
24
25
26 2
DB02/77626 I 0004/702 73 l S. l
ase 2:04-cv-00789-DGC Document 90 Filed O2/06/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00789-DGC

Document 90

Filed 02/06/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00789-DGC

Document 90

Filed 02/06/2006

Page 2 of 2