1
2
3 I . ·
4 iN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7 United States of America, Oli-(ji - [75 - PH>!'£QS l
8 _ _ Plaintiff, DETENTION ORDER
9 vs.
10 ` l
H SHA noon Lag |V\cC0ié‘-rj) _
Defendant. .
12
13
14 Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised
15 Release. The Court considered the Petition and tile in determining whether defendant
16 should be released on conditions set by the Court.
17 The Court finds that defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on -
18 supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to
19 revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clearand convincing evidence that
20 he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant
21 to 18 U.S.C. §3142(b) or (c). . ·
22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further
23 proceedings. 18 U.S.C. $143; Rules 32.1(a)(1) and 46(c), Federal Rules of Criminal
24 Procedure. ff rf Q _
25 DATED this day of `J , 2005.
26 -
27 Q Q; ew
EDWARD C. VOSS
28 United States Magistrate Judge
Case 2:01 -cr-OO1 Document 38 Filed IO7/19/2005 Page of 1 _
Case 2:01-cr-00175-ROS
Document 38
Filed 07/19/2005
Page 1 of 1