Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

— Case 1 :04-cv—00326-GIVIS Document 38 Filed 10/14/2005 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
g FOR THE Wnkvfi CIRCUIT
. jgmyl/yi B. gsm) €aS¢N<>-
Plaintiff — Appellee,
i v.
gl Application for Certificate ot`
_ _ Appealability
E ·’)'j,]OMA5 QMQEQO LL )1»/AROEW)
? I- ` ilu. ''.` ` r·:`·· `F
Defendant- Appellant. ..',- ··—`L UU if f.`_\1f/ _;
I fit? · » -.- ’,’i ‘
_1_g,]_J. . hy,
5 L .. J ` i “
.2 ,.1 _‘el - 12*-*2-. ni F11-.;;. t
. _ ,.`-‘ , - ‘__‘ up ·
` NOTICE AND INSTRUCTIONS I A I
I Your application for a certificate of appealability will be evaluated by the court using
these standards:
Certificate of Appealability. There must be a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right by demonstrating that the issues raised are debatable among jurists,
that a court could resolve the issues differently, or that the questions deserve further
proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir. 1996).
i FAILURE TO SET FORTH FACTS AND ARGUMENTS SHOWING THAT
YOU MEET THE APPROPRIATE STANDARD NVILL SUBJECT YOUR
_. APPEAL TO DISMISSAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE.

Case 1:04-cv—00326-GI\/IS Document 38 Filed 10/14/2005 Page 2 of 4
You may use this form to furnish a statement ofthe case, the issues you intend to
raise on appeal, and the reasons your appeal meets the applicable standards. The form is
intended to guide you in meeting the above standards. If you need more space to answer,
additional pages may be attached. The infomation you furnish, together with the full
record ofthe proceedings in the district court, will be the basis for this court’s decision.
You should bear in mind that an appeal is not a retrial, but rather a review ofthe district
court’s judgment and record ofproceedings.
APPLICATION
1. Statement ofthe _Case. (This should be a brief summary ofthe proceedings in the
district court.).T.»J ociobiia zoo; A Dal./t tom? Sopikzaa Coax}- C¢>;»o..:eljm> Mil. ref?/) 91% iigtaf
3* DEQQEE tZoi>€F1¢]- PDM} 1)u&T·M K__0NA pk _Z_ ww,}-5 0,% gggppg haqacf B¢·<3¥·/i K/Qgligtsiael ih {mm Ac
Sfmxopi IA·_;·§ y’Vl;ss‘>E/Vi.?/¤fJ0b’( CUMTUAL i"»’1i€€»l’Pi€¥· Mi!) wai sgormcawpf AS";
“ ‘ " » <`"".‘·",2o‘wz, *5 o·~,¤ e-
b j,m;g;l.UAg_ ¤¥;`5pf)·f`¢` irobub cia?. .»i'A·l¢ U KGCO O ‘·{ L] 9 8 ,4.,
Supaemz cl-- Wli¤aci»· 2.'° ZOG4
2. Issues to be Raised on Appeal. (New issues raised for the first time on appeal
generally will not be_ considered,) 3;,,; ENE;]-xvf Assz5l·/wc.€ of (’,.¤e,v$ELj '
cc,a.oseL Oro not mtrf Ep<>tq»._+1»~»€f is p»¢¤pii¤L·., ;qvv§SlI9Ai€ i_S
(;Ow,$g(_ ·¥‘/QLEO +0 Com mu.v1c»A|·b wnha R€€O l’iZ$°¤¢ 10 ·fKI_¤L. OR U'C$’i]`
REE;) Ai- i-smgeisl Am) hz; gy!) Noi Respovb io R€é`f>`5 LGH-é12$.(;w,o;€L
iA1L¤O ‘l<> lux TG (wppm ‘ · n ‘l "`
_, _ ` . -·— A - ,;Mr,;·_{— 4;, f>svFL¤p€ AMI Mnlaqafxsq mlaas
Co.;;o$¤L me ml "‘*‘l‘° "’°| “ - ~— · · 1;-:; ei wai-E MO
{iw!} wear;/) hw? RE !3oeE!) WLS $€t’l:lr/vci iq: _; N (J
gp;-Ali {O Aww V`);/I' NQSSES ?©£` RE*·`{>~’ {>•Z¥£ZNS*- l` _. (
3. Summary of Your Argument Showing that Your Appeal Meets the Standards
Stated onPa<>e1.'Th€ pr¤<>¢€<>~»l<>·*=$ €¤~’>~‘*i' wftb ***6 ·7¤¤< PWA P·<1¤·€ to
—ia1AL v1#oL:ir&`>’) RGEOG $7-* lla »PM€}"> MEQT Mi!) DVS p2o<;,&`·$3 R1tf1U‘+$;
A (*D;ov;;q,}-1¤a)- WE VI<;i‘1M €·~>b*? D20 WT YI 0‘E"°ij1¥‘1 REU} M qH<<1(/ILL
SIA _O NU} iM_,E— 7555`al {>E¥VV¤Ti“l*?V) ‘l>_1€`$‘lI·§;, P+<·‘}'KI}\L. /gs¥&vo$c
» ojb " . A ‘ V. (3 ' ` . 5
C’O_N_3EL was ;,g.;Nac»f:,v& Ai EV·YR'·] ipc} 6 ih PM - Ima
EQQLUBZNH REGISS l1pp‘J\¢_-
COA—1 Application for Certificate of Appealability l/99 Page 2

Case 1:04-cv—00326-Gl\/IS Document 38 Filed 10/14/2005 Page30f4
4. D0 you think the district court applied the wrong law? If so, what law do you
want applied? Somtl isms, MS,$l@pm»;¢'“ 'Ts/w{·¤?$ is A peviémglora sys
16 mol stxqnbtf le. andy A3 A yukon IM A Ql<1¤M¤¤·~>AL CM?} Ti*1#7`l"-/>/>¤7**·ZMf·E
O¥_'j'_yV1P'QQ[)](I.E{" » Ik) i,,,,UL_,;f Hag Py;OqSc.o[—¤p, mo llqa`_SAmz` quiet] p_A»o€ Qlg C'·TL\
Tg, A hm {ming poo Mom A Mw ‘l·"~1M·
5. Did the district court incorrectly decide the facts? Ifso, what facts? -
+L1A_ Vmlllm yy]£_g&u;_ 7s¤o.o!>$ NEv§\Q?0@»>f2l`>;£l) Yi/l1?.R£6`O
ps {lax p€R5o»0 who lesbbm l»m·#i,Ar~>0)1ll4¤1‘ Hom? MER? ii Gila?
w:4N&_;_$&g who QOULO PgOq1Zl')E` Ar`) Amb; COo.o$.£L Al PERGOK) A,_>D,45‘t\)`*3l-;;,olL"jYOl»;lt>$·>») LOA? wM>·}l5Y) old A vi.oLA}.:¤."o¥
Pew balmtd In BEL Am) w¤oL¢’> V3? U“"—]l’*`l AWB 7%<’°Hl’¤l +0 Oc'"`
Ar\>:‘> AoA:L¢>l;lL&` lam -rz1l¤L.
6. Did the district court fail to consider important grounds for relief? If so, what
grounds? C<>o_;u$E`L lem mlmowl Mw. Tl·¤:·»w> 7’>r—·< ~¤?l+· Sfzlrmo +l,A;= {LHS
Shoal Amwol Ol {Img .10 p.a:;—pzm&` ¥Os(+¤<.'1lAL cA~:$€`/> Som? pnobtsmg wz;-in
l {1,; Q,;>(s&’ Am!) -¥AILLui&·? ol ·hc1AL qui) E lo qyaAl·Jl’ conixnuhrééf D»25.`?;»i>.2cé`0
Rgwgs K1-_ql,,{~l»O A ¥All€ femnt. Ami) 5?¥5e{~;v§` [lasts A,¤c.S ¤ C,oo:v>tL
bwhg 4,+M Ammlb mmf ol 7. Do you feel that there are any other reasons why the district court’s judgment
_ was wrong? If_s0,_What'?‘Tlq{ Sopmzmnia (mozl ol C,m>;eq€-lows} DSL. D·z,$mzs·>FD
OMS 7¤·*’-OK -"¤° MAO €·¤¤—>l·A$}r walk Hqi ps2osfc~>l—qx lla; elim; qozozs IAA-)
C_Nhq,f L_,;l—l,, Hq? P‘r¤<>$¢‘?C¤l—o& As wat; 7s;4;Aoa·E"· An.? ALL my +l,,;<_'
Swag jogtl P;i,osL/ Pest,. Th? Y>c¥¤n\>·f3¢v¤T *»l4¤oLO»o$l» xlqavy Eggs; y3;~,,;¤)
P Maw fiom] P¤¤L PNG/0% NW) P*‘*°(°E°"l'°’”· l`) WM/$—` A l\Ar;,4 ·};g~,;A[' Pan
Gm NJ:) lf-We islam') P/¤¤\’l“$
COA-1 Application for Certificate of/Xppealability l/99 Page 3

Case 1:04-cv—00326-Gl\/IS Document 38 Filed 10/14/2005 Page 4 of 4
l 8. What action do you want this court to take in your case?
jj WAM +lq&' 3**0 qxzcient Coon} ot}? »M>p&¤¢.5 ie Aonnvsi
ML ML? (;[_,AI.y•.a$ isecisogp 1 6»=l¤»A¤$l—¤> ALL my g(,Azms_
IM ,,,.7 A/>pm¤L p,.} Hq; ·>¤pm¢1¤v_ caozf AMD Sopleems cooséf
0; ("7fOg_qE+0i,vl\) RULE AMB SUPREME Cov!.} {USL.
OQ APOUNL L]g_2_ g_0OY>
9. Were you required to seek and exhaust administrative remedies prior to tiling
your claim in district court? If yes, what steps did you take to exhaust those
d' ? F? _ ·
l§;pE:L MO. GLU DIRECT /ip/),51i(_ g,,.pp_,5yy,K`QOUg}j;tf)Oo51Q, DFLPWARF
‘ 4 - 1 . {. 05+ 4·,,~V¤,l¤¤.J iestmfl} no 4,27. 2,003 txt?/.>
Q,p.‘,E ¤i¤i<>7.T>€lZ>l was gv . Li
" Vi-] 2,003 DE`N"`E`O /1-q`¤`>l· G, ZOO} TI"'? HOMOKMLE E Sc’°++ TSM')
$UN~ " . 4:
eupmeét tml ol *>¤~¢’*< "‘““*’*“‘ "’° °/Zz ?“°°3
Suismtjflabi »SANuARc' {Lp ,2;:>o<[ D5`CJ!D xy /4/U ia ~gwz
Date ignature V
COA—1 Application for Certificate ofAppealability I/99 Page 4

Case 1:04-cv-00326-GMS

Document 38

Filed 10/14/2005

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00326-GMS

Document 38

Filed 10/14/2005

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00326-GMS

Document 38

Filed 10/14/2005

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00326-GMS

Document 38

Filed 10/14/2005

Page 4 of 4