Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 56.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 20, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 366 Words, 2,258 Characters
Page Size: 614.64 x 790.56 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192797/32.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 56.0 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02928-JSW

Document 32

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 1 of 2

1

2 3 4 5

6
7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RONALD BRATTON, 12 Plaintiff,
13

9
10 11

Case No. C 07-2928 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.
14 BEN CURRY, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18

Plaintiff Ronald Bratton (Plaintiff) is a state inmate who filed this action under 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 and makes claims for violations of the Eighth Amendment, the Religious Land Use and

\~

19 Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), Equal Protection, and classification policies against 20 21 22 23 Defendants Curry, Chudy, Hill, Hedrick, Raghunath, Grannis, Aboytes, and Klein (Defendants). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this action because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies before filing suit, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Defendants argued that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his

24 because he failed to pursue his administrative appeal for his Eighth Amendment claim through 25 26 the requisite third level of review, and because Plaintiff could not possibly have exhausted any appeal for his supplemental claim before he filed this action.

27 III 28 III
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.' Mot. Dismiss & Mot. Summ. J.

R. Bratton v. B. Curry, et at. . Case No. C 07-2928 JSW

1

Case 3:07-cv-02928-JSW

Document 32

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

Defendants also filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that there are no

2 genuine issues of material fact, that Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter oflaw, and 3 that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. 4 After full consideration of all pleadings and good cause appearing, the Court grants

5 Defendants' motion to dismiss the action without prejudice. The Court also grants, Defendants' 6 motion for summary judgment and qualified immunity.

7 8 9 Dated:
10

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge

11

12
13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.' Mot. Dismiss & Mot. Summ. 1.

R. Bratton v. B. Curry, et at. Case No. C 07-2928 JSW

2