Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 10.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 5, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 383 Words, 2,404 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192808/4.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 10.9 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 1:07-cr-00330-NJV

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990) United States Attorney MARK L. KROTOSKI (CABN 138549) Chief, Criminal Division WENDY THOMAS (NYBN 4315420) Special Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6809 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties appeared before the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas on May 29, 2007. With the agreement of counsel for both parties, the Court found and held as follows: 1. The parties agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), from May 29, 2007 to June 6, 2007, in light of the need for the defendant's counsel to obtain and review discovery. Failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence and the need for counsel to review the discovery with the defendant. [PROPOSED[ ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME v. KRISTEN NEWHOUSE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. CR 07-0330 MAG

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME FROM MAY 29, 2007 TO JUNE 6, 2007

CR 07-0330 MAG

Case 1:07-cr-00330-NJV

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2007

Page 2 of 2

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by 1 excluding the period from May 29, 2007, to June 6, 2007 outweigh the best interest of the public 2 and the defendant in a speedy trial. Id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 3 3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period 4 from May 29, 2007 to June 6, 2007 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18 5 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED[ ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 5/30/07 /s/ WENDY THOMAS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney DATED: 6/4/07 /s/ GEOFFREY HANSEN Counsel for Kristen Newhouse

DATED:_______________

________________________________ THE HON. NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

CR 07-0330 MAG

2