Free Status Report - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 747-7 Filed 08/O3/2007 Page1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 747-7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 3
Albany New York
At ¤¤*¤ Sr Aldridge. .. P·~*·¤¤€·¤~¤
Brussels Am),-nays at Law A Sacramento
D""““ 1900 K sneer, NW · Washington, oc 20006-1108 $"" D‘°9°
LOS A¤s<==*€s tal. 202.4%.7500 · Fax: 202.496.7756 $¤¤ F¤·¤<*s<<>
wwwmckennalongcom Washington, D.C,
CASS W. CHRISTENSON EMAM. Aooaess
(202) 496-7218 [email protected]
August 3, 2007
VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL
Manuel Nelson, Esq.
Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz, LLP
333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2300
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Re: LG.Philips LCD C0., Ltd. v. T atung, et al.,
Civil Action No. 04-343 (JJF)
Dear Manuel:
I write in response to your letter dated August 2, 2007, which was emailed to me after the
close of business. I reviewed your letter today and agree that further discussions regarding the
issues in your letter are necessary. To be clear, we object to any effort to raise these new issues
with the Special Master in ViewSonic’s submission today, as we need to have an opportunity to
understand and resolve ViewSonic’s concerns. When you raised previous concerns in your July
23 letter, we addressed those concerns and we are working to resolve them. Your August 2 letter
raises several new issues that we have not previously discussed.
As you know, we have been working diligently on the issues that you raised on your July
23 letter, and in your absence we discussed those issues with Ms. Roman on July 30. Since that
time, we have produced additional documents and we have attempted unsuccessfully to schedule
a follow up call with you this week. While I understand that you were in jury duty, LPL has a
right to be informed of issues before they are submitted to the Special Master so that we have an
opportunity to discuss and resolve those issues. Your after hours letter that we received today
does not afford that opportunity given today’s deadline for pre-hearing submissions concerning
the August 7 hearing. Further, please note that we still await clarification on certain issues, as I
discussed with Ms. Roman on July 30. For example, we need to know what specific issues
ViewSonic intends to address in a further deposition. You mention some issues in your letter,
but you also indicate that those issues are examples and may not be a complete list of the issues.
Without knowing what information ViewSonic seeks, it is difficult for us to find alternative ways
to address the issues without the need for a further deposition of LPL, to which we object.

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 747-7 Filed 08/O3/2007 Page 3 of 3
Manuel Nelson, Esq.
August 3, 2007
Page 2
We look forward to further discussions with you so that we can avoi e need for further
argument on these issues. In response to your proposal for a call on Augu , we are available
at 3:00 Washington time. Please let us know whether that ti e is convenie t or ou.
Sincere , /
Cass . Christenson
cc: Counsel of Record (via email)

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 747-7

Filed 08/03/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 747-7

Filed 08/03/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 747-7

Filed 08/03/2007

Page 3 of 3