Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 29.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 17, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 539 Words, 3,346 Characters
Page Size: 595 x 841.7 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7712/108-10.pdf

Download Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware ( 29.7 kB)


Preview Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv—00360—JJF Document 108-10 Filed O3/17/2006 Page 1 of 2 y
ROTHWELL, FIGG. ERNST Sr MANBECK, HC.
1425 K Street, N.W G. Franklin Rorhwell Anne M. Srerba
Suite 800 E. Anthony Figg Lisa N. Phillips `
wrrrrrrrrr- 0-0- 20005 E2‘.‘i$'é ‘§r.‘i§§;r. J. é‘?‘r5l.it$i“2?tS?$ *
Gem c R. Re cr Patrick T Skaccl
Telephone 202,78],6040 Srcvdn Lieberirian Monica C. Kms ,
rrcsrmrir ZO2·783-6031 {§§fjb*;Q,lQl’,';’,} §,‘f,“,‘],f; g$;$f‘°“ E
W"’“’·‘f°m·COm Richard Wyderren Sreverr M. Giovarrnern l
Frbrurrv in 2006 ¤?;;·.‘2.ai‘2Z‘·C* r‘§#;i5;:.;i:*;r:..,. i
Sharon L. Davis Adam M. 'licrbcr
VM E-MA11. SZEZWQELLY. Eiftiéi ETX? l
jeffrey L. lhnen `
Dmd W‘ H"“*“" Esq §l;xl§Ei;:ii.Ph-¤- i€i$‘f.“i§LC.r.i. q
Senniger, Powers, Leavitt & Roedel mm ` (ism pom B¤*'*m““*'**i Walk°°Ph`D` r
One Metropolitan Square, l6lh Floor ’N`" Ad“““°d "` DC J
St. Louis, MO 63102
Re: Trilegiant Loyalty Solutions v. Maritz
Our Reference 2829-179
Dear David:
I write in response to your February 7, 2006 request for a response to Ma1itz’s concerns
regarding TLS’s privilege log and not logging post—litigation prosecution documents. Your
January 3, 2006 letter is the only one TLS has received raising concems about its privilege log
and TLS responded to that letter on January I6, 2006. TLS responded to Mr. Clark’s January 24,
2006 letter regarding not logging post·litigation documents on January 26, 2006:
[Ylour assertion that Trilegiant "desire[s] to avoid logging or producing post
litigation documents that could bear on [its] inequitable conduct defense" is not
only baseless it is nonsensical, as the patents in suit obviously issued prior to the
date of suit. ln any case, Trilegiant already has logged all privileged documents
relating to the prosecution ofthe patents in suit.
Mr. Clark apparently overlooked our response when writing his January 31, 2006 letter.
It is Maritz, not Trilegiant, whose privilege log remains deficient. Maritz has completely
ignored our January 6, 2006 and January 26, 2006 letters, attached hereto. Not only has Maritz
not remedied the numerous privilege log deficiencies discussed in those letters, Maritz still has
not produced a privilege log for any of the numerous documents Maritz produced in redacted
form in 2005, which documents include but are not limited to MAR000208-l2, MAR000233—34,
MAR000769, and MAR] 08096-98,for example.
TLS interprets Maritz’s silence as a refusal to comply with TLS’s reasonable requests and .
plans to seek a remedy with the Court.
Ex. 9

Case 1:04-cv—00360—JJF Document 108-10 Filed 03/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
ROTHWELL, FIGG. ERNST & MANBECK nc.
David W. Harlan, Esq.
February 17, 2006
Page 2 l
Very truly yours,
{ r

R. Elizabeth Brenner l
l
REB:erh
1
cc: J. Bennett Clark, Esq. l
Enclosure l
L:\2S29\2S29— l 79.lit\Let1ers\Harlan. l2.doc ,
l
l
l
l
{
l
l
1

Case 1:04-cv-00360-JJF

Document 108-10

Filed 03/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00360-JJF

Document 108-10

Filed 03/17/2006

Page 2 of 2