Free Memorandum in Opposition - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 98.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 509 Words, 3,217 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7712/142-1.pdf

Download Memorandum in Opposition - District Court of Delaware ( 98.0 kB)


Preview Memorandum in Opposition - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-00360-JJF Document 142 Filed 05/1 1/2006 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
AFFINION LOYALTY GROUY, INC., )
Plaintiff g Civit Action No. 04-360-JJF
l
v. )
}
MARITZ INC., )
Defendant. g
CITATION OF SUBSEQUENT AUTHORITY UNDER DEL. L. R. 7.1.2 gc;
Pursuant to Delaware Local Rule 7. E .2 (c), Maritz Inc. ("Maritz") respectfully draws the
Court’s attention to a recent Federal Circuit decision: In re Ec/iosmr Commtmtcation Corp.,
2006 WL 1149528 (Fed. Cir. May l, 2006)(Exhibit A). The Ec/tester decision has direct
application to Ptaintiff’ s Motion to Compel Production of Docurnents (Di. 87).
In Ec/zostccr, the Federal Circuit granted rnandamus relief to vacate a District Court°s
order that had broadiy construed the waiver of attorney work product privilege in respect to a
good faith reliance on advice of counsel defense to a willful patent intringenaent charge. The
District Court’s order wontd have caused the outside opining law Erm to produce documents that
were not provided to the client and did not reflect communications with the client. in Ecizosrnr,
the Federai Circuit stated that a defense of good faith reliance on advice of counsel does not give
the patentce unfettered discretion to "pillage" defendant’s litigation strategies or "run2n1age
through" its tiles. Docurnents that reflected the attorneys’ rnental impressions or legal opinions
but were not given to the client were not within the scope ofthe waiver and were not
discoverable.
l

Case 1:04—cv—00360-JJF Document 142 Filed 05/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Respectfuiiy submiited,
/’ 4 Ve»eYe$e{2 1 eeeee i
mm; May 11, 2006 =ee; ;~= e5·; ‘‘`
Patricia Smink Ro wski
Rudolf E. Hutz (#494) O
CONNOLLLYL BOVE LODGE & HUTZI LLP
P.O. Box 2207
E007 N. Orange Sireei
Wiimington, DE 19899
(302) 658-9141
Attorneys for Defendant, Maritz 1110.
OF COUNSEL:
5. Bennett Clark
Jexmifer E. Hoekel
Marc W. Vander Tuig
David J. Harlan
SENNIGER POWERS
One Meiropoiitan Square, 16th Floor
St. Louis, MO 63102
(314) 2316400
2

Case 1 :04-cv-00360-JJF Document 142 Filed 05/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
l, hereby certify that on May 1], 2006, I electronically tiled CITATION OF
SUBSEQUENT AUTHORITY UNBER DEL. L. R. 7.l.2{c) with the Court Clerk _
using CM/ECP which will send notification of such 5ling{s) to Jack B. Blumenfeld and
Maryellen Noreika.
1 hereby further certify that on May 11, 2006, 1 have also served this document on
the attorneys of record at the following addresses as indicated:
Via Hand Delivery Via Federal Exgress
J ack B. Blumenfeld Steven Lieberman
Maryellen Noreika Sharon L. Davis
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunneli Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbec-lc, P.C.
1201 N. Market Street 1425 K Street, NW.
PO. Box 1347 Seite 800
Wilmington, DE 19899-l 1347 Washington, D.C. 20005
....— # ..*"‘ t
Patricia Srnink R gowski 632)

Case 1:04-cv-00360-JJF

Document 142

Filed 05/11/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00360-JJF

Document 142

Filed 05/11/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00360-JJF

Document 142

Filed 05/11/2006

Page 3 of 3