Free Order on Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 63.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 26, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 412 Words, 2,319 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7719/22.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware ( 63.4 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00367-Gl\/IS Document 22 Filed 09/26/2005 Page 1 of 2 '
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE .
I
THCI COMPANY, LLC, )
)
Plaintiff, ) '
)
v. ) C.A. No. 04-367 (GMS)
)
ABE BRIARWOOD CORP., ) I I
)
Defendant. ) I
ORDER
WHEREAS the Defendant in the above-captioned action filed a motion to dismiss
Plaintiffs complaint based, in part, on the Plaintiffs alleged failure to comply
Fed. R. Civ. P. l3(a) (D.I. 5 at 3-4); ,j'
} I
WHEREAS "the objective of Rule l3(a) is to promote judicial economy, so the
‘transaction or 0ccurrence’ is construed generously to further this purpose," T ransamer la
Occidental Ly? Ins. C0. v. Aviation Ojjice 0fAm., Inc., 292 F.3d 384, 390 (3d Cir. 2002); U
I
WHEREAS "[f]or a claim to qualify as a compulsory counterclaim, there need not be pre e
identity of issues and facts between the claim and the counterclaim; rather, the relevant inqui ii
whether the counterclaim bears a logical relationship to an opposing party’s claim," id. at
(citations omitted); H
II
WHEREAS the Plaintiff explicitly acknowledges the logical relationship between the clai s
in the present case and the so-called "Missouri Complaint" previously filed by the Defendant
subsequently transferred to this court (D.I. 7 at 3); and H
WHEREAS the appropriate remedy for failure to comply with Rule l3(a) is dismissal un er q
Rule l2(b)(6), see MBIA Ins. C0rp. v. Royallndem. C0., 294 F. Supp. 2d 606, 613 (D. Del. Mar. l,
2003). i lk
l i


E
· l
l

Case 1:04-cv-00367-GI\/IS Document 22 Filed 09/26/2005 Page 2 of 2 I
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT; I
I. The Defendant’s motion to dismiss (D.I. 5) be GRANTED without prejudice as t he
Plaintiff s ability to reinstate its claims as counterclaims in the "Missouri Complaint;" II d
2. The Plaintiff" s motion to consolidate (D.I. 8) be DENIED as moot. I I
II, _ _
I I 0 if-c ' , II if I F I::_}___; .*2;;* Il
Dated: September &_, 2005 · _
I sr ES DISTIH ` ' · `
II “
F I L ula I
_ _ II
m e I
OURT
¤I’§¤I’é?‘§é°JEirI»I ARE I
I I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
2 I
I
II

Case 1:04-cv-00367-GMS

Document 22

Filed 09/26/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00367-GMS

Document 22

Filed 09/26/2005

Page 2 of 2