Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 48.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 400 Words, 2,461 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7741/22-4.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware ( 48.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv—OO389—***—M PT Document 22-4 Filed 05/O2/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN TI-IE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
)
PSA, Inc. )
)
Plaintifi )
)
v. ) CIVIL ACTION No. 04689-—KAJ
)
Inter-World Communications, Inc., )
Corpserve, S.A. de C.V., World Center ) -
of Video Conferences, S.A, de C.V., )
Dean Hollis Velazco, and John Remke, _ )
)
Defendants. _ )

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND CAPTION ·
On this date the Court considered the Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (the
"Motion”) filed bythe Plaintiff ETS Payphones, Inc. (Capitalized terms not defined here have
the meanings ascribed to them in the Complaint.)
Having considered the Motion, and the papers, pleadings and arguments of counsel, and
having found that notice of the Complaint has been properly served upon the defendants, it is the
Courl:’s judgment that the Motion should be granted.
1. It is hereby Ordered that the Plaintiff shall have leave to file the Amended
Complaint attached to the Motion as Exhibit "A."
2. It is also hereby Ordered that the Defendant shall have ten days from the date of
this Order in which to answer any allegations raised in the Amended Complaint but not raised in
the Complaint. All answers to allegations made in the original Complaint shall be preserved
without the necessity of the Defendants’ restating their responses to those allegations.
3749716
vn=s;t1esnn.z csvtsarcei

Case 1:04-cv—OO389—***—MPT Document 22-4 Filed 05/O2/2005 Page 2 of 2
3. The caption is hereby amended to read as follows:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ETS Payphones, inc., )
Plaintiff] )
v. · ) CIVIL ACTION Nc. 04—389—KAJ
i11ter——Wor1d Communications, Inc., )
Corpserve, S.A. de C.V., World Center )
of Video Conferences, S.A. de C.V., )
Dean Hollis Velazco, and John Remke, ) ·
Defendants. )

4. This Order is without prejudice to the Piain1;iff’ s rights to move for leave to
amend its complaint tc conform to evidence adduced at or before trial as provided under the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dated: , 2005
THE HONORABLE KENT A. JORDAN,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
w1=s;z 1118167,2 cs74s4.:00t

Case 1:04-cv-00389-***-MPT

Document 22-4

Filed 05/02/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00389-***-MPT

Document 22-4

Filed 05/02/2005

Page 2 of 2