Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-00418-SLR

)LVK

5LFKDUGVRQ SF

Document 306

Filed 01/04/2006

Page 1 of 1
6XLWH 1 0DUNHW 6WUHHW SR %R[ :LOPLQJWRQ 'HODZDUH 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOH :HE 6LWH ZZZIUFRP

! % $ %! ¤9¤ 8"¤ ¤§¤5¢© ¨310 )( 7 6 ¥¡4 2

FB"9CTRS @ C @

¢#Ip8gfi#qVpA F U AI DI

¤ ¤#"¤ '& % $!! ¢© ¤¦§¦¤¢ ¨ ¨¡£ ¥£¡

BY EMAIL AND HAND DELIVERY January 3, 2006 Clerk of the Court United States District Court for the District of Delaware 844 King Street Wilmington, DE 19801

a
§A3DB"BAB@ @ @ C U X @ @ C TBWVB"¢U3S §9T¢iGQg8I9#"F ` U C C @ h D f CI fGYuvRQBgY8tHFTrV S D A e DI s @ b X Q ` TR¢aV§YD U Q e U S D @ R§#I3dBcF D Q A Q RBHFGBP DI A E 8BHFGB@

Re:

Seagate Technology/Cornice, Inc. USDC-D. Del. - C.A. No. 04-418 (SLR)

Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed for filing please find a redacted version of Plaintiff Seagate Technology LLC's Response Brief Regarding Construction Of Disputed terms In U.S. Patent No. 6,744,606. Defendant Cornice asserts that the brief filed on December 16, 2005, also titled Plaintiff Seagate Technology LLC's Response Brief Regarding Construction Of Disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,744,606 (D.I. 242), contains privileged communications. Seagate therefore requests that the Court destroy the December 16, 2005 version of Plaintiff Seagate Technology LLC's Response Brief Regarding Construction Of Disputed terms In U.S. Patent No. 6,744,606, and replace it with the redacted version attached hereto. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Timothy Devlin Timothy Devlin TXD/jrm Enclosure cc: Jack Blumenfeld, Esquire (w/encl. via email and hand delivery) David C. Radulescu, Esquire (w/encl. via email and Federal Express) Russell Wheatley, Esquire (w/encl. via email and Federal Express) Mathew D. Powers, Esquire (w/enc. via email and Federal Express)
80029220.doc