Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case1:O4—cv-OO583—GIV|S D0cument102—5 Filed O9/06/2005 Page10f4
E h `b `t D

Case 1 :04-cv-00583—Gl\/IS Document 102-5 Filed 09/06/2005 Page 2 of 4
. . if
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT courzr * · _ n n · h
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ` ` - I
In re: INACOM CORP., etal. Barrkm tc Case No: 00-2426 (P `
INACOM CORP., on behalf of all Civil Action N0. 04-148 GMS { "*' l -/ -| ( A
affiliated Debtors, - . (Original tiled in this Action) ` SD (
v. Adversary Case No. 02-03496 PJW E 2 .
'1`ECH DATA CORP., Defendant,. U) E
INACOM CORP., on behalf of all Civil Action No. 04~582 GMS E E
____ .... ...... .. . .... -.... .... .. .. .. . .. .- ...-. .: .. .... .... _ . .. .. _, ;___.,.__, .. I . _ .. , , . PIE
. v. · -·
DELL COMPU'I`ER CORPORATION, I Adversary No. 02-03499 PJW -
Defendant .‘-` n p
INACOM CORP., on behalf of all Civil Action No. 04-583 GMS ` _
affiliated Debtors, _ · · - E
v_ ‘ Z
LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Adversary No. 02-03500 PJW Q
Defendant. F
>
INACOM CORP., on behalf of all Civil Action N0. 04-593 GMS
affiliated Debtors,
. .v.
INGRAM ENTERTAINMENT INC., Adversary Case No. 02-03960 PJW _
successor in interest to NASHVILLE `
COMPUTER LIQUIDATORS, A ` ‘ `
Defendant. .
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION CONSIDERED BY EXPERT WI'I‘NESS ‘
(Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26§a}j2[§§[ __
_ .,.. · PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) -
__ and Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 7026, Plaintiff Inacom Corp. ("INACOM") hereby
· requests the prompt delivery of the following with respect to expert opinions to be rendered by
.- Kevin Sarkesian of Lexmark Intemational, Inc.: l W I » :
A NOTICE OF DEPOSITION V I
1 _ g otman I
A A 9* 75*4/U
Q 3 er 4

I in Case 1 :04-cv-00583—Gl\/IS Document 102-5 Filed 09/06/2005 Page 3 of 4 (
I ·_ _1. All data and other information considered by Mr. Sarkesian in forming any expert l J
F opinion to be rendered at trial. _ _ -
_ 2. Any exhibits to be used to support Mr. Sarkesianls expert opinions; · ’ ` ·
‘ . 3. A list of all publications authored by the Mr. Sarkesian within the preceding ten
wars: _ . . ._,&,... V l
l 4. A listing of any other cases in which the he has testitiedas an expert at trial or by
If deposition within the preceding four years. _ 3 I l `
- ~ -·-- ·- -·»-· ·*mi·tr6res· “§iEi§££iiig`§H§`Eip¢R ‘'‘``‘ ` " ° ” -’ _ C
opinion. h ` ni I
U All such information should be delivered to Jeffrey Nolan, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, n
Young, Jones & Weintraub P.C., 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 11°‘ Floor, Los Angeles, Califomia I
-. LQEEZ ` '
90067, on or before July 31, 2005, in order to permit sufticient time for preparation of the
‘ depositions of the Witness, currently scheduled for August 1, 2005.
Dated: July 21, 2005 PACHULSKI, STANG, ZIEHL, YOUNG, JONES & U
‘ wBn~mzAUB 1>.c. y
Laura Davis Jones (Bar No. 2436) l
E Q- Andrew Caine (CA Bar No. 110345) _
Jeffrey P. Nolan (CA Bar No. 158923) ‘
919 North Market Street, 16th Floor
P.O. Box 8705
·V.l Wilmington, Delaware 19899-8705 (Courier 19801)
` Telephone: (302) 652-4100 " , `
Facsimile: (302) 652-4400 __ _
Counsel rm Ptaamarr
_, ; *5 ‘ Nonce or Derosmou -
A 2

Case 1 :04-cv-00583—Gl\/IS Document 102-5 Filed 09/06/2005 Page 4 of 4
" -_ ‘ I ‘ I ' n PROOF OF SERVICE ` ' I
_` STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
- . ) .
CITY OF LOS ANGELES ) _ _ Q
I I I, Sally A. Miller, I am employed in the city and county of Los Angeles, State of .
Califomia. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is `
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 1100, Los Angeles, Califomia 90067 .
· On Iuly gl, 2005, I caused to be served the Request for Information Considered by C"-
Expert Witness (Lexmark) in this action by placing a tame and correct copy of said document(s)
in sealed envelopes addressed as follows:
TCD
Please see attached Service List _ _ :0 Q
. _ _ ¤
__ _____j_ :_ ___.,_,__.,_,H_,_.;,__,.==,T¤,.$,_.,,,.,_,L;_,,.£,,_,,,,,,,__: ,.;,,*;..,,;,;.1.,,..-....-...:,;.-,-...me ~...»...---;..-`.-.·..w=lt·—·-.».·,.···.···.·.¤-·~,s·-·¤··-··ww-·:~¤-~·-· =·-·¤ ··-- ···=- =-·¤=·-·=··=· ·- .····-T-·2·:··.-: .. ~ .. ·. . ‘ .‘ . .. au {
· (BY MAIL) I am readily familiar with the tim1’s practice of collection and processing "
IZI correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S.
Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles;
California, in the ordinary course of business. Iam aware that on motion of the party - . ‘
_ served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is _
more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. _ _
(BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) I caused to be transmitted the above—described document by ‘ .
IZ electronic mail (E-mail) to the address(es) as shown. (Service by E-Mail transmission is _ ¤
only to those parties on the attached Service List with email address(es) indicated.) . E
- . u
(BY FAX) I caused to be transmitted the above—described_document by facsimile
EI machine to the fax number(s) as shown. The transmission was reported as complete and
without error. (Service by Facsimile Transmission to those patties on the attached List
with fax numbers indicated.) .
i (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) By causing to be delivered by hand to the offices of the
D addressee(s). - ·
I declare that I am employed in the oftice of a member of the bar of this Court at whose
direction was made. · _ .
Executed on July QL, 2005, at Los Angeles, Califomia. ‘ II
I g { 01; Q 1
Sally A. Miller `
42l25·003\DOCS_LA:l40546.| ‘ _

Case 1:04-cv-00583-GMS

Document 102-5

Filed 09/06/2005

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00583-GMS

Document 102-5

Filed 09/06/2005

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00583-GMS

Document 102-5

Filed 09/06/2005

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00583-GMS

Document 102-5

Filed 09/06/2005

Page 4 of 4