Free Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04—cv—00583-GI\/IS Document 95-4 Filed 08/29/2005 Page 1 of 3
Inacom v. Lexmark Kevin Sarkisian
Page 1
1 U.S. DISTRICT COURT §
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE g
2 cAsE No. 04—cV—583
3 _________________________________________________ _____
4 DEPOSITION OF KEVIN SARKISIAN 5
INACOM CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF
6 ALL AFFILIATED DEBTORS PLAINTIEE g
7 v. 5
8 LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEFENDANT é
9 LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. THIRD—PARTY g
PLAINTIEE E
10 V. 5
ll COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP., ITY CORPORATION, THIRD—PARTY E
AND CUSTOM EDGE, INC. DEFENDANTS §
l2 ______________________;______
13 Pursuant to Notice, the deposition of KEVIN é
14 SARKISIAN was taken on behalf of the Plaintiff before é
15 Patricia A. Seckley, Court Reporter and Notary Public E
16 in and for the State of Kentucky at Large, at the E
17 offices of Stoll, Keenon & Park, 300 West Vine Street, i
18 Suite 2100, Lexington, Kentucky on Monday, August 1, i
19 2005, commencing at the hour of 10:00 a.m. E
20 The deposition was taken for purposes of discovery é
21 and for all other purposes permitted under all i
22 applicable laws. i
23 _________ __ __________________ ___ ______________ ______
24 ACTION COURT REPORTERS Q
184 North Mill Street E
25 Lexington, Kentucky 40507 {

Case 1 :04—cv—00583-GI\/IS Document 95-4 Filed 08/29/2005 Page 2 of 3
Inacom v. Lexmark Kevin Sarkisian
Page2
1
2 ARREARANcEs g
3 couNsRL FOR PLAINTIFF: §
Jeffrey P. Nolan
5 RAcHULsK1, STANG, ZIRHL, Younc, Jones R WEINTRAUB, R.c. §
1011 Santa Monica Boulevard
6 11th R166x
Los Angeles, California 90067-4100
7 i
8 i
coumsnr FOR DEFENDANT LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.: i
9 1
10 Culver V. Halliday
sToLL KEENoN & PARK 5
11 400 West Market Street, Suite 2650
Louisville, Kentucky 40202-3377
12 f
13 i
14
15 g
16
17 i
18 §
19 i
20
21 §
22 3
23 E
24 Q
25 {

Case 1:04—cv—00583-GI\/IS Document 95-4 Filed 08/29/2005 Page 3 of 3
Inacom v. Lexmark Kevin Sarkisian
Page 17
1 certain guidelines to prevent collusion. But we do get Q
2 a view of what the other vendors are offering to §
3 customers, especially vendors that are very much like g
4 us that are printer companies or have some —— at least i
5 some portion of other company sells printers. But my g
6 knowledge would tell me that, you know, everyone does 3
7 act independently and makes their own decisions g
8 regarding terms and what credit limits they're going to i
9 set and when they're going to become worried about a §
10 customer and when they might invoke a stop shipment. i
11 Q. Okay. The competitor —- you mentioned the i
12 competitors of Lexmark in the —— in the printing i
13 industry, correct? 3
1 4 A . uh-huh .
15 Q. Okay. Can you tell me who the competitors Q
16 are of Lexmark in the printing industry. §
17 A. Our main competitors are Hewlett Packard, i
18 Canon, and Epson. i
19 Q. And anybody else? g
20 A. Well there's a few smaller groups. g
21 Q. Okay. g
22 A. Xerox, Kodak, Brother International. i
23 Q. Okay. i
24 A. Fuji Xerox, Samsung, Kyocera. I think it's E
25 K—y—o—c—e—r—a, let's see, [phonetic: Kee—oh—seer—uh]. f

Case 1:04-cv-00583-GMS

Document 95-4

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00583-GMS

Document 95-4

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00583-GMS

Document 95-4

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 3 of 3