Free Declaration - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 107.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 29, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 459 Words, 2,850 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7945/65-1.pdf

Download Declaration - District Court of Delaware ( 107.3 kB)


Preview Declaration - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00593-GMS

Document 65

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR T FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re INACOM CORP ., et al ., Debtors . )
)

)

INACOM CORP ., on behalf of all affiliated Debtors, ) Plaintiffs, V. INGRAM ENTERTAINMENT INC ., as successor in interest to NASHVILLE COMPUTER LIQUIDATORS, L .P., Defendant . ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No . 04-593 (GMS)

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN P . HERSEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO .2 TO EXCLUDE ALLEGEDLY UNDISCLOSED AND UNIDENTIFIED WITNESSE S I, Jonathan P . Hersey, declare : 1. The matters stated herein are based on my personal knowledge, and if

called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to them . 2. I am a partner with the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton

LLP, attorneys of record for defendant Ingram Entertainment Inc . ("Ingram") in this action . I am licensed to practice before all courts of the State of California, and am also admitted to practice
pro hac vice in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware . I make this

declaration in support of Ingram's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion In Limine No . 2 to Exclude Allegedly Undisclosed an Unidentified Witnesses (the "Motion") .

W02-0G 3JPH 1 \41402264 .1

-I -

Case 1:04-cv-00593-GMS

Document 65

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 2 of 2

3.

The identity of each of the witnesses that Plaintiff seeks to exclude by this

Motion were previously disclosed to Inacom before the close of discovery, and Plaintiff deposed each of them . 4. Ingram, Dell, Lexmark and Tech Data have been coordinating discovery

of these cases since August 2004, before the first deposition was taken in any of these Defendants' cases . On May 10, 2005, these four defendants also filed a Motion to Consolidate the Cases for Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) . 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a true and correct copy of the Notice of

Service of Defendant Dell Computer Corporation's Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, which as the Notice of Service indicates, was served on Inacom's counsel at both the law firm of Blank Rome, LLP and the law firm of Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young Jones & Weintraub, P .C . Dell's Supplemental Responses included the identity of Messrs . Keller, Horton, Thomas and LaRocca . 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is a true and correct copy of the Notice of Deposition of Expert Kevin Sarkisian that Plaintiff served on Ingram, and counsel for the other defendants, on July 19, 2005 . I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct . Executed this 291" day of August, 2005, at Costa Mesa, California .

W02 - 0 C :3JPP11\41402264 . 1

-2-