_, Case 1 :04-cv-00612-GIVIS Document 18-12 Filed O3/31/2005 Page •
{C ~ _ l IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
_ FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE A el
IN RE: INACOM CORP., et al. __ - h ` i
. . Inacom Corp., C ._ ) _ ` ‘ C I
) ._ .
- .. _ Plaintiff, ) Civil Action N0. 04-612 GMS _ _ _ v _,
. > ‘
. v. » ) _
- General Electric Company, ) -
_ · ) Advérsary Case No. 03-50501
Defendant. ) Bankruptcy Case N0. 00-2426 PIW e
- __ STIPULATED-CONTINUAN CE OF SCHEDULING ORDER -
The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that the date for
» · " l hcompletion of discovery in the- above-captioned-matter ·should -be extended ninety days until ‘
. -..March 9, 2005. All other deadlines should be extended to accommodate this changer The `_ ` .- - ·
l ILCHSOHS for the deadline extension arehiset forth below; U `- -- A I l E . ‘ ·
if . n y _ 1. On September 13, 2004, Inacom served its Plaintiff’ s First Set of Document
Producti-on Requests, Plaintiff s First_Set or Interrogatories to Defendant and Plaintiff’s Request I
·· for Admission Propounded to Defendant, Set One. n .
A 2. . On September 22, 2004, the Court held a status conference and entered a -
_ . scheduling order in this matter that set a discovery deadline of December 9, 2004 [D.I. 6].
n I - 3. · The parties have conferred numerous times regarding Defendant’s response tor P .
A discovery. Defend-ant has conducted a diligent search of its records and contacted numerous _
l employees regarding this matter. Due to the passage of time and employee tumover, Defendant
has been tunable to locate records or personnel with the requisite information and knowledge to _
_ { _ respond to the discovery requests propou-nded by the Plaintiff. n l I
‘ GE3Continuance I _ :
Case 1:04-cv-OO612—Gl\/IS Document 18-12 Filed O3/31/2005 Page 2 of 2 ·
( ‘ _ T 4. Plaintiff noticed the deposition of the person most knowledgeable regarding the ‘
allegations set forth in the Complaint for December 2, 2004. However the parties were unable to
proceed with the deposition because they have been unable to locate the person most
- knowledgeable. _ `
:5. Plaintiff noticed and conducted the deposition of Larry Klein a former employee L
of the Defendant on December 3, 2004. Mr. Klein was unable to rec-all a majority of the A
information requested by Plaintiff. 1 -`
. · , 6. Therefore, due to the pa1ties’ desire to complete meaningful discovery prior to
participating in a trial on this matter, the parties respectfully request that the Court Center an order K
__ extending the discovery deadline in this case until March 9, 2005 and adjust the remaining .
n l deadlines set forth in the scheduling order to account for this extension. ` I » . A - n `
A- 1 l `LANDIS RATH at coms LLP U A In K .1>AcHuLs. srANc,h n HL, yotmc, 1 K - r . ·
j· - . .- ¤- . · l-JONES i?i:¤gr¤··· · i€£ /·· -; - t p
. _ - _. j . .
. \~!l&; L- •‘ ` .
I Daniel B. Rath, Esquire (#3022) _ Laura es (Bar No. 2436) ` I : `"
- Rebecca L. Butcher, Esquire (#3816) Andrew . ' aine (CA Bar No. 110345) `
_ 919 Market Street, Suite 600 Jeffrey P. Nolan (CA Bar No. 158923)**
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 -- -919 North Market Street, 16th Floor_
(302) 467-4400 . P.O. Box 8705 . Q
‘ Wilmington, Delaware 19899-8705
Attorneys for Defendant Telephone: (302) 652-4100 . _ , _
_ Facsimile: (302) 652-4400 ` I
` _. Attomeys for Plaintiff _ l
. SO ORDERED this 1 [ -l h" day of December, 2 04. ‘ A _. ‘
‘ ‘ \
` FILED . ,· lv Av .
‘ - nited States Distri ge
lf V
usnm L l l `
DISTRICTTDREDEEEWJEAE .
GE Continuance
Case 1:04-cv-00612-GMS
Document 18-12
Filed 03/31/2005
Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00612-GMS
Document 18-12
Filed 03/31/2005
Page 2 of 2