Free Motion to Continue - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 111-3

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Edward O.C. Ord, Esq. (SBN 52123) Ord & Norman 233 Sansome Street, Suite 1111 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 274-3800 Facsimile: (415) 274-3838 Attorney for Defendants Charles Hsin and Optech Limited

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES CATHCART, SCOTT CATHCART, YURIJ DEBEVC, a/k/a YURI DEBEVC, ROBERT NAGY, DERIVIUM CAPITAL (USA), INC., VERIDIA SOLUTIONS, OPTECH LIMITED, CHIHSIU HSIN, a/k/a CHARLES HSIN, FRANKLIN THOMASON Defendants. __________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS CHARLES HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE L7-11 TO CONTINUE THE ENTIRE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE ORDER Civil No. 07-4762-PJH

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Defendants Charles Hsin and Optech Limited moved the Court for a continuance of the entire case management schedule order as outlined in the Court's Civil Minute Order of January 3, 2008. Upon consideration of the matters submitted by the parties, the arguments of counsel, and all of the papers and pleadings on file in this Action, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED. The following new deadlines shall apply: 1. The last day to amend pleadings would be May 10, 2009. 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 TO CONTINUE THE ENTIRE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE ORDER

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 111-3

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3

2. The cut-off date for the designation of experts would be July 25, 2009. 3. The cut-off date for non-expert discovery would be August 8, 2009. 4. The cut-off date for expert discovery would be September 6, 2009.

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 TO CONTINUE THE ENTIRE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE ORDER

5. Dispositive motions would be heard by October 24, 2009. 6. Trial would be set for February 28, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September _____, 2008 ____________________________ J. PHYLLIS HAMILTON United States District Judge

T:\Clients\7118\Motions\Motion to continue case management schedule order proposed order.doc

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 111-3

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 4, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to the following: Joseph P. Russoniello United States Attorney Thomas Moore Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division 9th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Attorney for Plaintiff HUONG T. BAILIE Special Trial Attorney 160 Spear Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Attorney for Plaintiff Farley J. Neuman ([email protected]) Tom Prountzos ([email protected]) Jenkins Goodma Neuman & Hamilton LLP 417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Attorneys for Defendant, Robert Nagy David Bujannoff Porter, Jr. ([email protected]) Wood & Porter 333 Sacramento Street San Francisco, California 94111 Attorney for Defendant Scott Cathcart Yuri Debevc (pro se) ([email protected]) 1483 Burningtree Road Charleston, SC 29412 Allyson B. Baker Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 7238 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 ([email protected]) Attorney for Plaintiff

ERIC L. WEBB BARTSCH & WEBB 9157 W. Sunset Boulevard, Suite 310 Los Angeles, California 90069 ([email protected]) Attorney for Defendant Charles Cathcart

/s/ Edward O. Ord____ EDWARD O. ORD

3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 TO CONTINUE THE ENTIRE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE ORDER