Free Order on Motion for Bill of Costs - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04755-JSW

Document 118

Filed 09/12/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JOHN GIDDING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEREK ANDERSON, et al., Defendants. / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 5, 2008, Defendant Marie Claude Simon filed a motion for bill of costs and simultaneously filed her bill of costs. On June 15, 2008, Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the motion. On June 23, 2008, Simon filed a reply. On July 3, 2008, the Clerk sent a letter to Simon advising her that her bill of costs could not be taxed because judgment had not yet been entered. On August 1, 2008, Simon filed a motion for entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). On September 10, 2008, the Court granted that motion and entered judgment. By this Order, if Simon still seeks costs, the Court hereby directs her to resubmit her bill of costs within the time required under N.D. Civ. L.R. 54-1. No motion is necessary. If Plaintiffs have objections to the renewed bill of costs, they may filed their objections within the time frame required by N.D. Civ. L.R. 54-2. // // // ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR BILL OF COSTS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO No. C 07-04755 JSW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14

Case 3:07-cv-04755-JSW

Document 118

Filed 09/12/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

The motion filed on June 5, 2008, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as are Plaintiffs' objections to that motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 12, 2008 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2