Free Motion to Stay - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

I Case 1 :04-cv-0081 4-G IVIS-IVI PT Document 27-2 Filed 03/31 /200.6 Page 1 of 1
‘ ,__,_ _ _L U.S. Department of Justice
Q United States Attorney ’s Ojice
’ District of Delaware
1007 M Orange Street, Suite 700 (302) 573-6277
P. 0. Box 2046 F.4x(s0z) srs-6220
. Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2046 TTY (302) 573- 6274
Toll Free (888) 293-8162
n March 31, 2006
Via ECF
· Honorable Kent A. Jordan
- J . Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 N. King Street
Room 6325
Lockbcx 10
7 Wilmington, DE 19801
i Re: Lechliter v. Dep’t. of Army et al., Civ. A. No. 04-814-KA]
Dear Judge Jordan:
‘ I am writing in advance of the scheduling teleconference in the above·referenced matter,
which is set for April 4 at 1:00 p.m.
. The parties have reached agreement that this action should be stayed pending the Army’s
review of a revised Privacy Act Amendment Request that plaintiff has agreed to provide to
j undersigned counsel. The scope ofthe parties’ agreement is set forth in the attached courtesy
copy ofthe Defendants Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings and proposed fonn of Order.
Accordingly, the parties do not believe the teleconference need go forward. However, of
course, they remain available if the Court wishes to discuss this matter.
` Respectfully subn1i1.1:ed,
COLM F. CONNOLLY -
‘ Unit d States Attorney _
f BY; » or _
Leonard P. Stark
_ Assistant United States Attorney
Enclosures U
_ cc: Gerald A. Lechliter, pro se (via e-mail and First-Class Mail) . I ‘

Case 1:04-cv-00814-GMS-MPT

Document 27-2

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 1 of 1